Guo Xiamei, Slesnick Natasha, Feng Xin
Department of Human Sciences, The Ohio State University.
J Fam Psychol. 2014 Feb;28(1):98-105. doi: 10.1037/a0035380. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
This study reports secondary outcome findings on depressive symptoms from a randomized clinical trial testing three interventions for substance-abusing runaway adolescents. In particular, the effect of a family systems therapy, Ecologically Based Family Therapy (EBFT), and two individual therapies, the Community Reinforcement Approach (CRA) and Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET), on adolescent and primary caretaker (PC) depressive symptoms were compared. Findings showed that youth's depressive symptoms were significantly reduced in each treatment to 2 years postbaseline. However, the trajectory of change differed across treatments, with adolescents receiving MET showing a more rapid reduction in depressive symptoms but a quicker increase in symptoms compared with adolescents receiving EBFT. PCs receiving EBFT showed a statistically significant decline in depressive symptoms, but this was not observed for the CRA and MET conditions. These findings can be interpreted to favor EBFT, although future research is needed to test training and implementation strategies for family systems therapies in community-based runaway shelters.
本研究报告了一项随机临床试验的次要结果,该试验测试了针对滥用药物的离家出走青少年的三种干预措施。具体而言,比较了一种家庭系统疗法——基于生态的家庭疗法(EBFT),以及两种个体疗法——社区强化法(CRA)和动机增强疗法(MET),对青少年和主要照顾者(PC)抑郁症状的影响。研究结果表明,在基线后2年的每种治疗中,青少年的抑郁症状均显著减轻。然而,不同治疗方法的变化轨迹有所不同,接受MET治疗的青少年抑郁症状减轻更快,但与接受EBFT治疗的青少年相比,症状反弹也更快。接受EBFT治疗的主要照顾者抑郁症状有统计学意义的下降,但在CRA和MET治疗组中未观察到这一现象。这些结果可以解释为支持EBFT,尽管未来还需要研究以测试在社区离家出走青少年庇护所中家庭系统疗法的培训和实施策略。