Suppr超能文献

支气管镜肺减容术。欧洲视角。

Endoscopic lung volume reduction. A European perspective.

机构信息

1 Department of Pneumology and Respiratory Care Medicine, Thoraxklinik at University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Translational Lung Research Center, Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Dec;10(6):657-66. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201301-003FR.

Abstract

Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) offers a novel therapeutic approach for patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. In Europe, several types of ELVR are available. The choice of ELVR technique depends both on the distribution of emphysema and the presence or absence of interlobar collateral ventilation (CV). For this reason, accurate patient selection is crucial. Bronchial valve implantation is the technique that has been most widely studied and represents an effective treatment option for patients with severe heterogeneous upper- or lower-lobe-predominant emphysema. Lobar occlusion and low interlobar CV are predictive factors for positive outcomes. Lung volume reduction coil implantation is an effective option for patients with upper- and lower-lobe-predominant emphysema, and the efficacy is not influenced by CV; however, the technique should be regarded as mainly irreversible. Polymeric lung volume reduction relies on irreversible scarring and fibrosis and is especially effective in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease classified as Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage III; it also offers benefits to patients with upper-lobe-predominant emphysema and those with homogeneous emphysema. Like polymeric lung volume reduction, bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation is also not influenced by CV and represents a good option for patients with upper-lobe-predominant emphysema. Exhale airway stents for emphysema--"airway bypass"--appeared to be a promising technique but proved ineffective in randomized clinical trials, likely in part due to long-term occlusion of the drug-eluting stents. Although European physicians are able to choose from a host of approved bronchoscopic interventions for emphysema, future studies for techniques in use are needed to further clarify patient selection criteria.

摘要

内镜下肺减容术(ELVR)为严重肺气肿患者提供了一种新的治疗方法。在欧洲,有几种类型的 ELVR 可供选择。ELVR 技术的选择取决于肺气肿的分布以及是否存在肺段间侧支通气(CV)。因此,准确的患者选择至关重要。支气管瓣植入术是研究最多的技术,是严重上叶或下叶优势肺气肿患者的有效治疗选择。肺段闭塞和低肺段间 CV 是阳性结果的预测因素。肺减容线圈植入术是上叶和下叶优势肺气肿患者的有效选择,CV 不影响疗效;然而,该技术应被视为主要不可逆。聚合体肺减容术依赖于不可逆的瘢痕形成和纤维化,在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)全球倡议(GOLD)分期 III 患者中尤其有效;它还为上叶优势肺气肿患者和肺气肿均匀的患者提供了获益。与聚合体肺减容术一样,支气管镜下热蒸汽消融术也不受 CV 影响,是上叶优势肺气肿患者的一个很好的选择。肺气肿呼气气道支架——“气道旁路”——似乎是一种有前途的技术,但在随机临床试验中证明无效,部分原因可能是药物洗脱支架的长期闭塞。尽管欧洲医生可以从众多批准的支气管镜介入治疗肺气肿中进行选择,但需要对正在使用的技术进行进一步研究,以进一步阐明患者选择标准。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic lung volume reduction. A European perspective.支气管镜肺减容术。欧洲视角。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013 Dec;10(6):657-66. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201301-003FR.
3
Endoscopic bronchial valve treatment: patient selection and special considerations.内镜下支气管瓣膜治疗:患者选择及特殊考量
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Oct 8;10:2147-57. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S63473. eCollection 2015.
4
Endoscopic approaches for treating emphysema.内镜治疗肺气肿。
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2018 Aug;12(8):641-650. doi: 10.1080/17476348.2018.1491794. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
9
Interventional pulmonology in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的介入肺病学
Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2017 May;23(3):261-268. doi: 10.1097/MCP.0000000000000373.

引用本文的文献

4
Endoscopic bronchial valve treatment: patient selection and special considerations.内镜下支气管瓣膜治疗:患者选择及特殊考量
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015 Oct 8;10:2147-57. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S63473. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验