Murray D, vanAnkeren S C, Meyn R E
Anal Biochem. 1987 Jan;160(1):149-59. doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90625-7.
We have critically evaluated various modifications of the alkaline elution methodology that were required to adapt the method for measuring DNA damage in cells from animal tissues treated in vivo. These modifications involved the use of a fluorometric assay for the eluted DNA using the dye Hoechst 33258, which in turn required the use of a different combination of filter and lysis conditions than those used in conventional assays. This protocol was compared with the conventional protocols by examining the DNA damage produced in cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells after treatment with three agents (gamma-rays, cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (DDP) and trans-DDP) that differ widely in the type and repairability of the DNA lesions that they induce. For both gamma-rays and trans-DDP, the results obtained by the various protocols were equivalent with respect to the amount, type, and rate of repair of the DNA damage produced. On the other hand, for cis-DDP, where the repair time for DNA crosslinks was significantly long relative to the cell-cycle time, DNA replication appeared to be a potentially complicating factor in the measurement of crosslink repair. However, even after treatment of rapidly dividing cultured cells, where any discrepancy between the radioactivity and Hoechst assays due to DNA replication should be maximal, the resulting difference in the amount of repair measured using the two assays was relatively small. Finally, in experiments using cis-DDP and trans-DDP, the data suggested that when polycarbonate and polyvinyl chloride filters were compared using the same cell lysis conditions, their relative sensitivity to detect DNA-protein versus DNA-interstrand crosslinking were comparable. The modified alkaline elution protocol for the measurement of DNA damage in vivo therefore appears, in most cases, to produce results comparable with those obtained by the conventional protocols.
我们严格评估了碱性洗脱方法的各种改进措施,这些改进是为了使该方法适用于测量体内处理过的动物组织细胞中的DNA损伤。这些改进包括使用荧光分析法检测洗脱的DNA,使用染料Hoechst 33258,这反过来又需要使用与传统检测方法不同的滤膜和裂解条件组合。通过检测三种试剂(γ射线、顺式二氯二氨铂(DDP)和反式DDP)处理后培养中华仓鼠卵巢细胞产生的DNA损伤,将该方案与传统方案进行了比较。这三种试剂诱导的DNA损伤类型和可修复性差异很大。对于γ射线和反式DDP,各种方案所获得的结果在产生的DNA损伤的数量、类型和修复速率方面是等效的。另一方面,对于顺式DDP,其DNA交联的修复时间相对于细胞周期时间明显较长,DNA复制似乎是交联修复测量中一个潜在的复杂因素。然而,即使在处理快速分裂的培养细胞后,由于DNA复制导致的放射性检测和Hoechst检测之间的任何差异应该是最大的,但使用这两种检测方法测量的修复量的差异相对较小。最后,在使用顺式DDP和反式DDP的实验中,数据表明,当在相同的细胞裂解条件下比较聚碳酸酯和聚氯乙烯滤膜时,它们检测DNA-蛋白质与DNA链间交联的相对灵敏度是可比的。因此,在大多数情况下,用于测量体内DNA损伤的改良碱性洗脱方案所产生的结果似乎与传统方案所获得的结果相当。