Suppr超能文献

使用稀释对比剂优化冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影中的冠状动脉衰减

Optimization of coronary attenuation in coronary computed tomography angiography using diluted contrast material.

作者信息

Kawaguchi Naoto, Kurata Akira, Kido Teruhito, Nishiyama Yoshiko, Kido Tomoyuki, Miyagawa Masao, Ogimoto Akiyoshi, Mochizuki Teruhito

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine.

出版信息

Circ J. 2014;78(3):662-70. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-13-1101. Epub 2013 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a personalized protocol with diluted contrast material (CM) for coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA).

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred patients with suspected coronary artery disease underwent retrospective electrocardiogram-gated coronary CTA on a 256-slice multidetector-row CT scanner. In the diluted CM protocol (n=50), the optimal scan timing and CM dilution rate were determined by the timing bolus scan, with 20% CM dilution (5ml/s during 10s) being considered suitable to achieve the target arterial attenuation of 350 Hounsfield units (HU). In the body weight (BW)-adjusted protocol (n=50, 222mg iodine/kg), only the optimal scan timing was determined by the timing bolus scan. The injection rate and volume in the timing bolus scan and real scan were identical between the 2 protocols. We compared the means and variations in coronary attenuation between the 2 protocols. Coronary attenuation (mean±SD) in the diluted CM and BW-adjusted protocols was 346.1±23.9 HU and 298.8±45.2 HU, respectively. The diluted CM protocol provided significantly higher coronary attenuation and lower variance than did the BW-adjusted protocol (P<0.05, in each).

CONCLUSIONS

The diluted CM protocol facilitates more uniform attenuation on coronary CTA in comparison with the BW-adjusted protocol.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估一种用于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)的稀释对比剂(CM)个性化方案。

方法与结果

100例疑似冠心病患者在256层多排CT扫描仪上接受回顾性心电图门控冠状动脉CTA检查。在稀释对比剂方案组(n = 50)中,通过团注扫描确定最佳扫描时机和对比剂稀释率,20%对比剂稀释(10秒内5ml/s)被认为适合达到350亨氏单位(HU)的目标动脉衰减。在体重(BW)调整方案组(n = 50,222mg碘/kg)中,仅通过团注扫描确定最佳扫描时机。两种方案在团注扫描和实际扫描中的注射速率和体积相同。我们比较了两种方案之间冠状动脉衰减的均值和变异情况。稀释对比剂方案组和体重调整方案组的冠状动脉衰减(均值±标准差)分别为346.1±23.9 HU和298.8±45.2 HU。与体重调整方案相比,稀释对比剂方案提供了显著更高的冠状动脉衰减和更低的变异(各P<0.05)。

结论

与体重调整方案相比,稀释对比剂方案在冠状动脉CTA上有助于实现更均匀的衰减。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验