Department of Psychology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 N. Blackford St, LD 100E, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
Psychosom Med. 2014 Jan;76(1):29-37. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000022. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
Although depression is a risk and prognostic factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), depression trials involving cardiac patients have not observed the anticipated cardiovascular benefits. To test our hypothesis that depression treatment delivered before clinical CVD onset reduces risk of CVD events, we conducted an 8-year follow-up study of the Indiana sites of the Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Collaborative Treatment (IMPACT) randomized controlled trial.
Participants were 235 primary care patients 60 years or older with major depression or dysthymia who were randomized to a 12-month collaborative care program involving antidepressants and psychotherapy (85 without and 35 with baseline CVD) or usual care (83 without and 32 with baseline CVD). Hard CVD events (fatal/nonfatal) were identified using electronic medical record and Medicare/Medicaid data.
A total of 119 patients (51%) had a hard CVD event. As hypothesized, the treatment × baseline CVD interaction was significant (p = .021). IMPACT patients without baseline CVD had a 48% lower risk of an event than did usual care patients (28% versus 47%, hazard ratio = 0.52, 95% confidence interval = 0.31-0.86). The number needed to treat to prevent one event for 5 years was 6.1. The likelihood of an event did not differ between IMPACT and usual care patients with baseline CVD (86% versus 81%, hazard ratio = 1.19, 95% confidence interval, 0.70-2.03).
Collaborative depression care delivered before CVD onset halved the excess risk of hard CVD events among older, depressed patients. Our findings raise the possibility that the IMPACT intervention could be used as a CVD primary prevention strategy.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01561105.
尽管抑郁是心血管疾病(CVD)的风险和预后因素,但涉及心脏患者的抑郁试验并未观察到预期的心血管益处。为了检验我们的假设,即在临床 CVD 发病前进行抑郁治疗可降低 CVD 事件的风险,我们对改善心境促进协作治疗(IMPACT)随机对照试验印第安纳州的研究点进行了 8 年的随访研究。
参与者是 235 名年龄在 60 岁或以上的患有重度抑郁症或心境恶劣的初级保健患者,他们被随机分配到为期 12 个月的协作护理计划中,包括抗抑郁药和心理治疗(85 名无基线 CVD 和 35 名有基线 CVD)或常规护理(83 名无基线 CVD 和 32 名有基线 CVD)。使用电子病历和医疗保险/医疗补助数据确定硬 CVD 事件(致死性/非致死性)。
共有 119 名患者(51%)发生了硬 CVD 事件。如假设的那样,治疗×基线 CVD 的交互作用具有统计学意义(p =.021)。无基线 CVD 的 IMPACT 患者发生事件的风险比常规护理患者低 48%(28%对 47%,危险比=0.52,95%置信区间=0.31-0.86)。预防 5 年内发生 1 次事件的所需人数为 6.1。基线 CVD 的 IMPACT 患者和常规护理患者的事件发生率无差异(86%对 81%,危险比=1.19,95%置信区间,0.70-2.03)。
在 CVD 发病前提供的协作性抑郁护理使老年抑郁患者的硬 CVD 事件的过度风险降低了一半。我们的研究结果提出了一种可能性,即 IMPACT 干预措施可作为 CVD 一级预防策略。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT01561105。