1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1252-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000122.
The survival benefit of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome has been a matter of debate. Recent multicenter randomized controlled trials have shown a significant reduction of 28-day and 90-day mortality associated with prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis on this topic and elucidated the effect of prone positioning on overall mortality and associated complications.
PubMed, EMBASE, BioMed Central, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings through May 2013.
Randomized controlled trial comparing overall mortality of prone-versus-supine positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.
Data were extracted for populations, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. The prespecified primary endpoint was overall mortality, using the longest available follow-up in each study. The odds ratio with 95% CI was the effect measure.
This analysis included 11 randomized controlled trial, 2,246 total adult patients, and 1,142 patients ventilated in the prone position. Prone positioning during ventilation significantly reduced overall mortality in the random-effect model (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99; p = 0.039; I = 33.7%), and the effects were marked in the subgroup in which the duration of prone positioning was more than 10 hr/session, compared with the subgroup with a short-term duration of prone positioning (odds ratio, 0.62; 9% CI, 0.48-0.79; p = 0.039; pinteraction = 0.015). Prone positioning was significantly associated with pressure ulcers (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.89; p = 0.001; I = 0.0%) and major airway problems (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.10-2.17; p = 0.012; I = 32.7%).
Ventilation in the prone position significantly reduced overall mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sufficient duration of prone positioning was significantly associated with a reduction in overall mortality. Prone ventilation was also significantly associated with pressure ulcers and major airway problems.
俯卧位通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)机械通气中的生存获益一直存在争议。最近的多中心随机对照试验显示,严重 ARDS 患者接受俯卧位通气治疗后,28 天和 90 天死亡率显著降低。我们对此主题进行了最新的荟萃分析,并阐明了俯卧位通气对总体死亡率和相关并发症的影响。
PubMed、EMBASE、BioMed Central、Cochrane 中心对照试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 2013 年 5 月前的会议论文集。
比较急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者俯卧位与仰卧位通气总体死亡率的随机对照试验。
为人群、干预措施、结局和偏倚风险提取数据。预先指定的主要终点是每个研究中最长随访时间的总体死亡率。比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)为效应测量值。
本分析包括 11 项随机对照试验、2246 名成年患者和 1142 名接受俯卧位通气的患者。俯卧位通气在随机效应模型中显著降低了总体死亡率(OR,0.77;95%CI,0.59-0.99;p=0.039;I=33.7%),在俯卧位时间超过 10 小时/节的亚组中效果更为显著,与俯卧位时间较短的亚组相比(OR,0.62;9%CI,0.48-0.79;p=0.039;p 交互=0.015)。俯卧位通气与压疮显著相关(OR,1.49;95%CI,1.18-1.89;p=0.001;I=0.0%)和主要气道问题(OR,1.55;95%CI,1.10-2.17;p=0.012;I=32.7%)。
严重 ARDS 患者俯卧位通气可显著降低总体死亡率。俯卧位通气时间充足与总体死亡率降低显著相关。俯卧位通气也与压疮和主要气道问题显著相关。