Suppr超能文献

俯卧位通气治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效和安全性:11 项随机对照试验的更新研究水平荟萃分析。

The efficacy and safety of prone positional ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome: updated study-level meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 2Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1252-62. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000122.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The survival benefit of prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome has been a matter of debate. Recent multicenter randomized controlled trials have shown a significant reduction of 28-day and 90-day mortality associated with prone positioning during mechanical ventilation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis on this topic and elucidated the effect of prone positioning on overall mortality and associated complications.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, BioMed Central, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings through May 2013.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trial comparing overall mortality of prone-versus-supine positioning in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted for populations, interventions, outcomes, and risk of bias. The prespecified primary endpoint was overall mortality, using the longest available follow-up in each study. The odds ratio with 95% CI was the effect measure.

DATA SYNTHESIS

This analysis included 11 randomized controlled trial, 2,246 total adult patients, and 1,142 patients ventilated in the prone position. Prone positioning during ventilation significantly reduced overall mortality in the random-effect model (odds ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-0.99; p = 0.039; I = 33.7%), and the effects were marked in the subgroup in which the duration of prone positioning was more than 10 hr/session, compared with the subgroup with a short-term duration of prone positioning (odds ratio, 0.62; 9% CI, 0.48-0.79; p = 0.039; pinteraction = 0.015). Prone positioning was significantly associated with pressure ulcers (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.18-1.89; p = 0.001; I = 0.0%) and major airway problems (odds ratio, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.10-2.17; p = 0.012; I = 32.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Ventilation in the prone position significantly reduced overall mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sufficient duration of prone positioning was significantly associated with a reduction in overall mortality. Prone ventilation was also significantly associated with pressure ulcers and major airway problems.

摘要

目的

俯卧位通气在急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)机械通气中的生存获益一直存在争议。最近的多中心随机对照试验显示,严重 ARDS 患者接受俯卧位通气治疗后,28 天和 90 天死亡率显著降低。我们对此主题进行了最新的荟萃分析,并阐明了俯卧位通气对总体死亡率和相关并发症的影响。

数据来源

PubMed、EMBASE、BioMed Central、Cochrane 中心对照试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 2013 年 5 月前的会议论文集。

研究选择

比较急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者俯卧位与仰卧位通气总体死亡率的随机对照试验。

数据提取

为人群、干预措施、结局和偏倚风险提取数据。预先指定的主要终点是每个研究中最长随访时间的总体死亡率。比值比(OR)和 95%置信区间(CI)为效应测量值。

数据分析

本分析包括 11 项随机对照试验、2246 名成年患者和 1142 名接受俯卧位通气的患者。俯卧位通气在随机效应模型中显著降低了总体死亡率(OR,0.77;95%CI,0.59-0.99;p=0.039;I=33.7%),在俯卧位时间超过 10 小时/节的亚组中效果更为显著,与俯卧位时间较短的亚组相比(OR,0.62;9%CI,0.48-0.79;p=0.039;p 交互=0.015)。俯卧位通气与压疮显著相关(OR,1.49;95%CI,1.18-1.89;p=0.001;I=0.0%)和主要气道问题(OR,1.55;95%CI,1.10-2.17;p=0.012;I=32.7%)。

结论

严重 ARDS 患者俯卧位通气可显著降低总体死亡率。俯卧位通气时间充足与总体死亡率降低显著相关。俯卧位通气也与压疮和主要气道问题显著相关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验