From the *Nuclear Medicine Department, AP-HP, Hôtel Dieu Hospital; †Department of Imaging, Curie Institut; and ‡Faculty of Medicine, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
Clin Nucl Med. 2014 Jun;39(6):e343-5. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000000320.
Brain perfusion SPECT is commonly used to evaluate patients with cognitive impairments. Physical limits such as attenuation compromise image quality do not allow the most accurate depiction of radionuclide distribution, and thus, application of attenuation correction (AC) has been recommended. Some reports have demonstrated discordances between the uniform (UAC) and nonuniform CT-based correction (NUAC) procedures. The aim was to study the impact of these discordances on visual interpretation and their concordance with clinical symptoms.
Twelve patients presenting cognitive impairments were included. Brain perfusion SPECT images were reconstructed using 2 AC methods. Qualitative image assessment was performed as uptake analysis in 21 predefined cortical ROIs for each patient. Interpretation of perfusion patterns was based on a 2-score uptake scale (normal and reduced/pathologic). Variation of uptake scores in UAC- versus NUAC-processed images and their concordance with clinical symptoms were studied.
Normal image patterns generated by UAC and NUAC methods were found in 226 (90%) of 252 and in 201 (80%) of 252 ROIs, respectively. No difference between UAC and NUAC methods was found in posterior brain areas. However, differences were recorded in 51 (20%) of 252 ROIs, and this discordance was located in the anterior areas (frontal and temporal lobes), and evaluation changed from normal to pathological patterns using NUAC method. Two years later, patients showing frontal hypoperfusion on NUAC brain SPECT images expressed clinical frontal lobe dysfunctions.
Discordances between UAC- and NUAC-processed images impact visual analysis of brain perfusion SPECT images. The NUAC-processed images show a good concordance with clinical symptoms, suggesting that it is an accurate method to correct attenuation.
脑灌注 SPECT 通常用于评估认知障碍患者。物理限制(如衰减)会影响图像质量,无法准确描绘放射性核素分布,因此推荐应用衰减校正(AC)。一些报告表明,均匀(UAC)和基于非均匀 CT 的校正(NUAC)程序之间存在差异。本研究旨在探讨这些差异对视觉解释的影响及其与临床症状的一致性。
纳入 12 例认知障碍患者。使用 2 种 AC 方法重建脑灌注 SPECT 图像。对每个患者的 21 个皮质 ROI 进行摄取分析,进行定性图像评估。根据摄取评分 2 分量表(正常和减少/异常)对灌注模式进行解释。研究了 UAC 与 NUAC 处理图像之间摄取评分的变化及其与临床症状的一致性。
UAC 和 NUAC 方法生成的正常图像模式分别在 226(90%)和 201(80%)个 ROI 中出现。在后脑区域,UAC 和 NUAC 方法之间无差异。然而,在 51 个 ROI(20%)中记录到差异,这种差异位于前脑区域(额叶和颞叶),并且使用 NUAC 方法评估从正常变为异常模式。两年后,在 NUAC 脑 SPECT 图像上显示额叶灌注减少的患者表现出额叶功能障碍的临床症状。
UAC 和 NUAC 处理图像之间的差异会影响脑灌注 SPECT 图像的视觉分析。NUAC 处理图像与临床症状具有良好的一致性,表明这是一种准确的衰减校正方法。