Suppr超能文献

创伤中心质量排名:既往表现能否预测未来表现?

Ranking trauma center quality: can past performance predict future performance?

机构信息

*Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY †Department of Medicine, Center for Health Policy Research, University of California, Irvine ‡Department of Surgery, University of Vermont Medical College, Burlington; and §RAND, RAND Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):682-6. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000334.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether trauma center quality metrics based on historical data can reliably predict future trauma center performance.

BACKGROUND

The goal of the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program is to create a new paradigm in which high-quality trauma centers can serve as learning laboratories to identify best practices. This approach assumes that trauma quality reporting can reliably identify high-quality centers using historical data.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study on 122,408 patients in 22 level I and level II trauma centers in Pennsylvania. We tested the ability of the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model to predict future hospital performance based on historical data.

RESULTS

Patients admitted to the lowest performance hospital quintile had a 2-fold higher odds of mortality than patients admitted to the best performance hospital quintile using either 2-year-old data [adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 2.11; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.36-3.27; P < 0.001] or 3-year-old data (AOR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.34-3.21; P < 0.001). There was a trend toward increased mortality using 5-year-old data (AOR: 1.70; 95% CI: 0.98-2.95; P = 0.059). The correlation between hospital observed-to-expected mortality ratios in 2009 and 2007 demonstrated moderate agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.22-0.77). The intraclass correlation coefficients for observed-to-expected mortality ratios obtained using 2009 data and 3-, 4-, or 5-year-old data were not significantly different from zero.

CONCLUSIONS

Trauma center quality based on historical data is associated with subsequent patient outcomes. Patients currently admitted to trauma centers that are classified as low-quality centers using 2- to 5-year-old data are more likely to die than patients admitted to high-quality centers. However, although the future performance of individual trauma centers can be predicted using performance metrics based on 2-year-old data, the performance of individual centers cannot be predicted using data that are 3 years or older.

摘要

目的

探讨基于历史数据的创伤中心质量指标是否能可靠地预测未来创伤中心的绩效。

背景

美国外科医师学院创伤质量改进计划的目标是创建一个新的模式,其中高质量的创伤中心可以作为学习实验室,以确定最佳实践。这种方法假设创伤质量报告能够使用历史数据可靠地识别高质量中心。

方法

我们对宾夕法尼亚州 22 个一级和二级创伤中心的 122408 名患者进行了回顾性观察性研究。我们测试了创伤死亡率预测模型根据历史数据预测未来医院绩效的能力。

结果

与最佳表现医院组相比,收入绩效最差的医院组的患者死亡率高出两倍以上,无论是使用 2 岁[校正优势比(AOR):2.11;95%置信区间(CI):1.36-3.27;P < 0.001]还是 3 岁(AOR:2.12;95% CI:1.34-3.21;P < 0.001)数据。使用 5 岁数据时,死亡率呈上升趋势(AOR:1.70;95% CI:0.98-2.95;P = 0.059)。2009 年和 2007 年医院观察到的预期死亡率比值之间存在中度一致性(组内相关系数=0.56;95%CI:0.22-0.77)。使用 2009 年数据和 3 岁、4 岁或 5 岁数据获得的观察到的预期死亡率比值的组内相关系数与零无显著差异。

结论

基于历史数据的创伤中心质量与随后的患者结局相关。目前收入质量较差的创伤中心的患者比收入高质量中心的患者更有可能死亡,这些中心使用 2 至 5 岁的数据进行分类。然而,尽管可以使用基于 2 年数据的绩效指标来预测个别创伤中心的未来绩效,但不能使用 3 年或更长时间的数据来预测个别中心的绩效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验