Krebs Renee C, Roe Simon C, Lascelles B Duncan X, Marcellin-Little Denis J, Trumpatori Brian J, Spodnick Gary
Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Vet Surg. 2014 Feb;43(2):114-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.12091.x. Epub 2013 Dec 23.
To compare the mechanical properties of feline ilial fractures stabilized with either a plate (P), or a plate and IM pin (P + P).
Mechanical study.
Cadaveric cat pelvii (n = 10).
Feline ilial fractures (n = 20) stabilized with either P or P + P were subjected to 100 nondestructive load cycles, then loaded to failure. Deformation after cycling, yield load and displacement, stiffness and load at 2 mm of displacement were compared between groups.
There were no significant differences between groups for any of the parameters. Variability of data was much larger for the P + P group.
No biomechanical advantage was demonstrated. The P + P constructs were not significantly stronger than plates alone in this acutely loaded cadaveric model.
比较用钢板(P)或钢板加髓内针(P + P)固定的猫科动物髂骨骨折的力学性能。
力学研究。
尸体猫骨盆(n = 10)。
用P或P + P固定的猫科动物髂骨骨折(n = 20)进行100次无损加载循环,然后加载至失效。比较两组之间循环后的变形、屈服载荷和位移、刚度以及位移2mm时的载荷。
两组之间的任何参数均无显著差异。P + P组的数据变异性要大得多。
未显示出生物力学优势。在这个急性加载的尸体模型中,P + P结构并不比单独使用钢板明显更强。