25 rue Charles Floquet, 64100, Bayonne, France.
Mol Ecol. 2014 Jan;23(1):20-2. doi: 10.1111/mec.12569.
Understanding the consequences of habitat disturbance on mating patterns although pollen and seed dispersal in forest trees has been a long-standing theme of forest and conservation genetics. Forest ecosystems face global environmental pressures from timber exploitation to genetic pollution and climate change, and it is therefore essential to comprehend how disturbances may alter the dispersal of genes and their establishment in tree populations in order to formulate relevant recommendations for sustainable resource management practices and realistic predictions of potential adaptation to climate change by means of range shift or expansion (Kremer et al. 2012). However, obtaining reliable evidence of disturbance-induced effects on gene dispersal processes from empirical evaluation of forest tree populations is difficult. Indeed, tree species share characteristics such as high longevity, long generation time and large reproductive population size, which may impede the experimenter's ability to assess parameters at the spatial and time scales at which any change may occur (Petit and Hampe 2006). It has been suggested that appropriate study designs should encompass comparison of populations before and after disturbance as well as account for demonstrated variation in conspecific density, that is, the spatial distribution of mates, and forest density, including all species and relating to alteration in landscape openness (Bacles & Jump 2011). However, more often than not, empirical studies aiming to assess the consequences of habitat disturbance on genetic processes in tree populations assume rather than quantify a change in tree densities in forests under disturbance and generally fail to account for population history, which may lead to inappropriate interpretation of a causal relationship between population genetic structure and habitat disturbance due to effects of unmonitored confounding variables (Gauzere et al. 2013). In this issue, Shohami and Nathan (2014) take advantage of the distinctive features of the fire-adapted wind-pollinated Aleppo pine Pinus halepensis (Fig. 1) to provide an elegant example of best practice. Thanks to long-term monitoring of the study site, a natural stand in Israel, Shohami and Nathan witnessed the direct impact of habitat disturbance, here taking the shape of fire, on conspecific and forest densities and compared pre- and postdisturbance mating patterns estimated from cones of different ages sampled on the same surviving maternal individuals (Fig. 2). This excellent study design is all the more strong that Shohami and Nathan took further analytical steps to account for confounding variables, such as historical population genetic structure and possible interannual variation in wind conditions, thus giving high credibility to their findings of unequivocal fire-induced alteration of mating patterns in P. halepensis. Most notably, the authors found, at the pollen pool level, a disruption of local genetic structure which, furthermore, they were able to attribute explicitly to enhanced pollen-mediated gene immigration into the low-density fire-disturbed stand. This cleverly designed research provides a model approach to be followed if we are to advance our understanding of disturbance-induced dispersal and genetic change in forest trees.
了解生境干扰对交配模式的影响,尽管花粉和种子在森林树木中的散布一直是森林和保护遗传学的一个长期主题。森林生态系统面临着全球环境压力,包括木材开采、遗传污染和气候变化,因此,了解干扰如何改变基因的散布及其在树木种群中的建立是至关重要的,以便为可持续资源管理实践制定相关建议,并对通过范围转移或扩张(Kremer 等人,2012 年)对气候变化的潜在适应能力进行现实预测。然而,从森林树木种群的实证评估中获得关于干扰对基因散布过程影响的可靠证据是困难的。事实上,树种具有高寿命、长世代时间和大繁殖种群大小等特征,这可能会阻碍实验者评估任何变化可能发生的空间和时间尺度上的参数的能力(Petit 和 Hampe,2006 年)。有人建议,适当的研究设计应包括比较干扰前后的种群,并考虑到同种类密度的变化,即配偶的空间分布,以及森林密度,包括所有物种,并与景观开阔度的变化有关(Bacles 和 Jump,2011 年)。然而,往往是,旨在评估生境干扰对树木种群遗传过程影响的实证研究假设而不是量化干扰下森林中树木密度的变化,并且通常不考虑种群历史,这可能导致对种群遗传结构与生境干扰之间因果关系的不适当解释,因为未监测到混杂变量的影响(Gauzere 等人,2013 年)。在本期中,Shohami 和 Nathan(2014 年)利用火适应的风授粉的阿勒颇松 Pinus halepensis 的独特特征(图 1)提供了一个最佳实践的优雅例子。由于对以色列自然林研究地点的长期监测,Shohami 和 Nathan 目睹了生境干扰(这里是火灾)对同种类和森林密度的直接影响,并比较了从同一幸存母树上采集的不同年龄的锥体估计的干扰前后的交配模式(图 2)。这个出色的研究设计更加有力,因为 Shohami 和 Nathan 采取了进一步的分析步骤来考虑混杂变量,例如历史种群遗传结构和可能的年际风况变化,从而使他们关于火对 P. halepensis 交配模式的明确诱导改变的发现具有高度可信度。值得注意的是,作者在花粉库水平上发现了局部遗传结构的破坏,此外,他们能够明确地将其归因于增强的花粉介导的基因传入低密度火灾干扰的林分。这种巧妙设计的研究为我们提供了一种模型方法,如果我们要深入了解森林树木中的干扰诱导散布和遗传变化,就可以遵循这种方法。