Suppr超能文献

保乳手术后加速局部乳腺照射的疗效与安全性:已发表比较研究的荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of accelerated partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies.

作者信息

Kong Lingling, Cheng Jian, Ding Xiuping, Li Baosheng, Zhang Jian, Li Hongsheng, Huang Wei, Zhou Tao, Sun Hongfu

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital, Jinan, China; Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.

出版信息

Breast J. 2014 Mar-Apr;20(2):116-24. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12226. Epub 2013 Dec 26.

Abstract

To compare the treatment outcomes between accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and conventional whole-breast irradiation (WBI) and to explore the efficacy and safety of APBI as an adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer who received breast-conserving therapy. Eligible studies were identified on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library updated to July 10, 2012. Comparative studies were considered for inclusion. Analyses were carried out using Stata software. Eleven comparative studies with a total of 7,097 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that there were no statistically significant differences between group APBI and group WBI associated with the supraclavicular failure, distant metastasis, overall survival, and disease-free survival, while local recurrence (LR) and axillary failure (AF) increased in group APBI. The sensitivity analysis indicated that both the LR and AF were not statistically significant difference between the two groups. In the subgroup analysis, LR was statistically significantly higher in group APBI for patients with the age <60, large tumor size, and unknown margin status. APBI is a safe treatment modality and could become a potential option for the delivery of adjuvant radiation therapy in patients receiving breast-conserving therapy, especially for the suitable group that was classified by the American Society of Radiation Oncology Consensus Panel.

摘要

比较加速部分乳腺照射(APBI)与传统全乳照射(WBI)的治疗效果,并探讨APBI作为接受保乳治疗的早期乳腺癌辅助治疗的疗效和安全性。通过检索截至2012年7月10日更新的Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆来确定符合条件的研究。纳入比较性研究。使用Stata软件进行分析。共纳入11项比较性研究,总计7097例患者。荟萃分析显示,APBI组和WBI组在锁骨上区失败、远处转移、总生存和无病生存方面无统计学显著差异,而APBI组的局部复发(LR)和腋窝失败(AF)有所增加。敏感性分析表明,两组之间的LR和AF均无统计学显著差异。在亚组分析中,对于年龄<60岁、肿瘤体积大且切缘状态未知的患者,APBI组的LR在统计学上显著更高。APBI是一种安全的治疗方式,对于接受保乳治疗的患者,尤其是被美国放射肿瘤学会共识小组分类为合适的患者群体,APBI可能成为辅助放疗的一种潜在选择。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验