Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK.
J Mol Biol. 2014 Apr 3;426(7):1600-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.12.018. Epub 2013 Dec 24.
Three homologous spectrin domains have remarkably different folding characteristics. We have previously shown that the slow-folding R16 and R17 spectrin domains can be altered to resemble the fast folding R15, in terms of speed of folding (and unfolding), landscape roughness and folding mechanism, simply by substituting five residues in the core. Here we show that, by contrast, R15 cannot be engineered to resemble R16 and R17. It is possible to engineer a slow-folding version of R15, but our analysis shows that this protein neither has a rougher energy landscape nor does change its folding mechanism. Quite remarkably, R15 appears to be a rare example of a protein with a folding nucleus that does not change in position or in size when its folding nucleus is disrupted. Thus, while two members of this protein family are remarkably plastic, the third has apparently a restricted folding landscape.
三个同源的血影蛋白结构域具有显著不同的折叠特征。我们之前已经表明,通过在核心中替换五个残基,慢折叠的 R16 和 R17 血影蛋白结构域可以在折叠(和展开)速度、形貌粗糙度和折叠机制方面类似于快速折叠的 R15。在这里,我们表明,相比之下,R15 不能被设计成类似于 R16 和 R17。可以设计一种慢折叠版本的 R15,但我们的分析表明,这种蛋白质既没有更粗糙的能量景观,也没有改变其折叠机制。非常显著的是,R15 似乎是一个罕见的例子,说明当它的折叠核心被破坏时,其折叠核心的位置或大小不会改变。因此,虽然该蛋白质家族的两个成员具有显著的可变性,但第三个成员显然具有受限的折叠景观。