Suppr超能文献

比较肌肉-结节和实质-结节应变比在甲状腺良恶性结节鉴别中的应用:我们应该使用哪一个?

Comparison of muscle-to-nodule and parenchyma-to-nodule strain ratios in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: which one should we use?

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Samsun Education and Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey.

Department of Radiology, Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Radiol. 2014 Mar;83(3):e131-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.12.003. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of muscle-to-nodule strain ratio (MNSR) in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules and to see if there was a difference between MNSR and parenchyma-to-nodule strain ratios (PNSR) in diagnosis.

METHODS

A total of 106 consecutive patients (88 women and 18 men; age range 19-79 years) with thyroid nodules were prospectively examined using ultrasound and sonoelastography before the fine-needle aspiration biopsy. The mean MNSR and PNSR were calculated for each nodule and the elasticity score was determined according to four-point scoring system.

RESULTS

According to the four-point scoring system, 44 of the 83 benign nodules had a score of one or two while 22 of the 23 malignant nodules had a score of three or four (p<0.001). Using ROC analysis, the best cutoff point for MNSR 1.85 and for PNSR 3.14 was calculated. The sensitivity and specificity for the MNSR were 95.6%, 92.8%, respectively; for the PNSR were 95.6%, 93.4%, respectively, when the best cutoff points were used (p<0.001). The κ value for the PNSR and MNSR methods was 0.87, which indicated an almost perfect agreement (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sonoelastography has a high diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. There was no significant difference between MNSR and PNSR in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Therefore, we think that MNSR could safely be used in situations where PNSR could not be used.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨肌肉-结节应变比(MNSR)在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节中的诊断准确性,并比较 MNSR 与实质-结节应变比(PNSR)在诊断中的差异。

方法

前瞻性纳入 106 例甲状腺结节患者(88 名女性,18 名男性;年龄 19-79 岁),所有患者均在细针抽吸活检前行超声及声弹性成像检查。计算每个结节的平均 MNSR 和 PNSR,并采用四点评分系统确定弹性评分。

结果

根据四点评分系统,83 个良性结节中 44 个评分为 1 或 2 分,23 个恶性结节中 22 个评分为 3 或 4 分(p<0.001)。通过 ROC 分析,计算出 MNSR 最佳截断值为 1.85,PNSR 最佳截断值为 3.14。当使用最佳截断值时,MNSR 的敏感性和特异性分别为 95.6%、92.8%,PNSR 的敏感性和特异性分别为 95.6%、93.4%(p<0.001)。PNSR 和 MNSR 方法的κ 值为 0.87,表明具有几乎完美的一致性(p<0.001)。

结论

声弹性成像在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节中具有较高的诊断准确性。MNSR 和 PNSR 在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节方面无显著差异。因此,我们认为在无法使用 PNSR 的情况下可以安全地使用 MNSR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验