Odukoya Olufunmilola K, Stone Jamie A, Chui Michelle A
School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy and Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh, 3501 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
School of Pharmacy, Social and Administrative Sciences Division, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):837-852. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
The use of e-prescribing is increasing annually, with over 788 million e-prescriptions received in US pharmacies in 2012. Approximately 9% of e-prescriptions have medication errors.
To describe the process used by community pharmacy staff to detect, explain, and correct e-prescription errors.
The error recovery conceptual framework was employed for data collection and analysis. 13 pharmacists and 14 technicians from five community pharmacies in Wisconsin participated in the study. A combination of data collection methods were utilized, including direct observations, interviews, and focus groups. The transcription and content analysis of recordings were guided by the three-step error recovery model.
Most of the e-prescription errors were detected during the entering of information into the pharmacy system. These errors were detected by both pharmacists and technicians using a variety of strategies which included: (1) performing double checks of e-prescription information; (2) printing the e-prescription to paper and confirming the information on the computer screen with information from the paper printout; and (3) using colored pens to highlight important information. Strategies used for explaining errors included: (1) careful review of patient's medication history; (2) pharmacist consultation with patients; (3) consultation with another pharmacy team member; and (4) use of online resources. In order to correct e-prescription errors, participants made educated guesses of the prescriber's intent or contacted the prescriber via telephone or fax. When e-prescription errors were encountered in the community pharmacies, the primary goal of participants was to get the order right for patients by verifying the prescriber's intent.
Pharmacists and technicians play an important role in preventing e-prescription errors through the detection of errors and the verification of prescribers' intent. Future studies are needed to examine factors that facilitate or hinder recovery from e-prescription errors.
电子处方的使用量逐年增加,2012年美国药房收到的电子处方超过7.88亿份。约9%的电子处方存在用药错误。
描述社区药房工作人员检测、解释和纠正电子处方错误的过程。
采用错误恢复概念框架进行数据收集和分析。来自威斯康星州五家社区药房的13名药剂师和14名技术人员参与了该研究。采用了多种数据收集方法,包括直接观察、访谈和焦点小组。录音的转录和内容分析以三步错误恢复模型为指导。
大多数电子处方错误是在将信息录入药房系统时被发现的。药剂师和技术人员通过多种策略发现这些错误,包括:(1)对电子处方信息进行双重检查;(2)将电子处方打印到纸上,并将计算机屏幕上的信息与纸质打印件上的信息进行核对;(3)使用彩色笔突出显示重要信息。用于解释错误的策略包括:(1)仔细查看患者的用药史;(2)药剂师与患者进行咨询;(3)与药房的其他团队成员进行咨询;(4)使用在线资源。为了纠正电子处方错误,参与者对开处方者的意图进行有根据的猜测,或通过电话或传真联系开处方者。当社区药房遇到电子处方错误时,参与者的主要目标是通过核实开处方者的意图为患者正确处理医嘱。
药剂师和技术人员在通过检测错误和核实开处方者的意图来预防电子处方错误方面发挥着重要作用。未来需要进行研究,以检查促进或阻碍从电子处方错误中恢复的因素。