Suppr超能文献

双能 CT 能否改善口腔癌肿瘤边界评估?

Can dual-energy CT improve the assessment of tumor margins in oral cancer?

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, University Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.

University Clinic of Craniomaxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Austria; Department for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Feldkirch Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria.

出版信息

Oral Oncol. 2014 Mar;50(3):221-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.12.001. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim was to investigate the image quality of dual-energy computed-tomography (DECT) compared to single-energy images at 80 kV and 140 kV in oral tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty patients underwent a contrast-enhanced DECT scan on a definition flash-CT. Four reconstructions (80 kV, 140 kV, mixed (M), and optimum-contrast (OC)) were assessed by four blinded readers for subjective image quality (10-point scale/10=best). For objective quality assessment, linear attenuation measurements (line density profiles (LDP)) were positioned at the tumor margin, and the difference between minimum and maximum was calculated. Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) were measured in the tongue.

RESULTS

The mean image quality for all readers was 5.1±0.3, 8.4±0.3, 8.1±0.2, and 8.3±0.2 for the 140 kV, 80 kV, M, and OC, respectively (P<001 between 140 kV and all others). The mean difference between the minimum and maximum within the LDP was 139.4±59.0, 65.7±29.5, 105.1±46.5, and 118.7±59.4 for the 80 kV, 140 kV, M, and OC, respectively (P<001). The SNR for the tongue was 3.8±2.1, 3.8±2.1, 4.2±2.4, and 4.1±2.3 for the 80 kV, 140 kV, M, and OC, respectively.

DISCUSSION

DECT of oral tumors offers high image quality, with subjectively rated image quality and attenuation contrast at the tumor margin similar to that of 80 kV; DECT, however, provides a significantly higher SNR compared to 80 kV.

摘要

目的

旨在研究口腔肿瘤的双能 CT(DECT)与 80kV 和 140kV 单能图像的图像质量。

材料与方法

40 例患者在 definition flash-CT 上进行了增强 DECT 扫描。4 名盲法读者对 4 种重建图像(80kV、140kV、混合(M)和最佳对比(OC))进行了主观图像质量评估(10 分制/10 分为最佳)。客观质量评估方面,在肿瘤边缘放置线性衰减测量(线密度曲线(LDP)),并计算最小和最大之间的差异。在舌部测量信噪比(SNR)。

结果

所有读者的平均图像质量分别为 140kV、80kV、M 和 OC 时为 5.1±0.3、8.4±0.3、8.1±0.2 和 8.3±0.2(140kV 与其他所有组间差异均有统计学意义(P<001))。LDP 内最小和最大之间的平均差值分别为 139.4±59.0、65.7±29.5、105.1±46.5 和 118.7±59.4,差异均有统计学意义(P<001)。舌部 SNR 分别为 80kV、140kV、M 和 OC 时为 3.8±2.1、3.8±2.1、4.2±2.4 和 4.1±2.3,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

讨论

口腔肿瘤的 DECT 提供了高质量的图像,其主观评价的图像质量和肿瘤边缘的衰减对比度与 80kV 相似;然而,DECT 与 80kV 相比,提供了显著更高的 SNR。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验