Suppr超能文献

与 MMR 或 MMR+V 疫苗接种相比,MMRV 疫苗接种后发生热性惊厥的风险。

Risk of febrile convulsions after MMRV vaccination in comparison to MMR or MMR+V vaccination.

机构信息

Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Achterstraße 30, 28359 Bremen, Germany.

Center for Children and Adolescent Medicine of the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Vaccine. 2014 Feb 3;32(6):645-50. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.12.011. Epub 2013 Dec 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In July 2006, Priorix-Tetra™, a combined measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccine, was licensed in Germany. Since a postlicensure study had shown a more than twofold elevated risk of febrile convulsions (FC) after first dose vaccination with the combined MMRV vaccine ProQuad(®) compared to separately administered MMR and V vaccines (MMR+V), the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, the German regulatory agency for vaccine licensing and safety, requested a study investigating the risk of FC for Priorix-Tetra™.

METHODS

We performed a matched cohort study based on claims data of more than 17 million insurees in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database. All children born between 01.01.2004 and 31.12.2008 who received a 1st dose of MMRV vaccine were matched to children vaccinated with MMR, MMR+V and MMR or MMR+V (combined group), respectively, by sex, age, month of vaccination and statutory health insurance. The primary outcome was defined as hospitalization with a diagnosis of FC without any alternative plausible cause of FC, e.g. an infection or neurological condition, coded as main discharge diagnosis. The secondary outcome excluded only neurological conditions to provide a more comparable outcome definition to the one used in the ProQuad(®) study. Numbers needed to harm (NNH), risk ratios and confounder adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were estimated to compare the exposure groups.

RESULTS

In the main risk period 5-12 days after immunization, the adjusted ORs of the primary endpoint for immunization with MMRV vaccine relative to the comparator vaccine indicated in brackets were 4.1 [95% CI 1.3-12.7; MMR], 3.5 [0.7-19.0; MMR+V], and 4.1 [1.5-11.1; MMR and MMR+V]. The corresponding ORs for the secondary outcome were 2.3 [1.4-3.9; MMR], 1.5 [0.8-2.9; MMR+V] and 2.4 [1.5-3.9; MMR and MMR+V].

CONCLUSIONS

This study in children younger than 5 years, 90% of them between 11 and 23 months, shows a risk of FC similar in magnitude for Priorix-Tetra™ as has previously been reported for ProQuad(®) suggesting a class effect for these quadrivalent vaccines.

摘要

背景

2006 年 7 月,Priorix-TetraTM,一种麻疹、腮腺炎、风疹和水痘(MMRV)联合疫苗,在德国获得许可。由于一项上市后研究表明,与分别接种麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗和水痘(V)疫苗(MMR+V)相比,接种联合 MMRV 疫苗 ProQuad®后首次接种疫苗的热性惊厥(FC)风险高出两倍以上,德国疫苗许可和安全性监管机构 Paul-Ehrlich-Institute 要求开展一项研究,以调查 Priorix-TetraTM 疫苗接种后 FC 的风险。

方法

我们基于德国 Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database 中超过 1700 万被保险人的索赔数据,开展了一项匹配队列研究。所有于 2004 年 1 月 1 日至 2008 年 12 月 31 日之间出生并接受了第一剂 MMRV 疫苗接种的儿童,根据性别、年龄、接种月份和法定健康保险,分别与接种 MMR、MMR+V 和 MMR 或 MMR+V(联合组)的儿童进行匹配。主要结局是定义为没有任何其他可能导致 FC 的替代病因(例如感染或神经状况)的 FC 住院治疗,作为主要出院诊断进行编码。次要结局仅排除神经状况,以提供与 ProQuad®研究中使用的更可比的结局定义。采用需要治疗的人数(NNH)、风险比(RR)和混杂因素调整后的比值比(OR),以及 95%置信区间(CI)来比较暴露组。

结果

在免疫后 5-12 天的主要风险期内,与括号内对照疫苗相比,MMRV 疫苗接种的主要终点调整后的 OR 分别为 4.1(95%CI 1.3-12.7;MMR)、3.5(0.7-19.0;MMR+V)和 4.1(1.5-11.1;MMR 和 MMR+V)。次要结局的相应 OR 分别为 2.3(1.4-3.9;MMR)、1.5(0.8-2.9;MMR+V)和 2.4(1.5-3.9;MMR 和 MMR+V)。

结论

本研究纳入了 90%年龄在 11 至 23 个月的 5 岁以下儿童,表明 Priorix-TetraTM 接种后 FC 的风险与之前 ProQuad®报道的风险相似,提示这些四价疫苗存在类效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验