• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial.

作者信息

Collin Yves, Mayer Sandeep, Mosimann François

机构信息

Faculté de médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

出版信息

Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):e98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000448.

DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000000448
PMID:24374531
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎时单纯冲洗与单纯吸引的比较：一项前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):e98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000448.
2
Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎时单纯冲洗与单纯吸引的比较：一项前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):e111. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000488.
3
Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎时单独冲洗与抽吸的比较：一项前瞻性随机试验。
Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):581-5. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826a91e5.
4
Reply to letter: "irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis".对信件的回复：“腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗穿孔性阑尾炎时单纯冲洗与单纯吸引的比较”
Ann Surg. 2015 Apr;261(4):e98. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000449.
5
Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy; A randomized controlled equivalence trial.腹腔镜阑尾切除术期间单纯冲洗与单纯吸引的比较：一项随机对照等效性试验。
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28:91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.01.099. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
6
Copious Irrigation Versus Suction Alone During Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Complicated Appendicitis in Adults.成人复杂性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术期间大量冲洗与单纯吸引的比较
J Invest Surg. 2018 Aug;31(4):342-346. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2017.1319995. Epub 2017 May 9.
7
Peritoneal irrigation vs suction alone during pediatric appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: A meta-analysis.小儿穿孔性阑尾炎阑尾切除术中腹腔灌洗与单纯吸引的比较：一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Dec;98(50):e18047. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018047.
8
Infectious Complications After Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Pediatric Patients with Perforated Appendicitis: Is There a Difference in the Outcome Using Irrigation and Suction Versus Suction Only? Results of a Multicentric International Retrospective Study.小儿穿孔性阑尾炎腹腔镜阑尾切除术后的感染并发症：冲洗吸引与单纯吸引的结局是否存在差异？一项多中心国际回顾性研究的结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1266-1270. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0061. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
9
Laparoscopic Lavage Versus Aspiration Alone in Perforated Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.腹腔镜灌洗与单纯抽吸治疗穿孔性急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2020 Feb;30(1):14-17. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000745.
10
REsiDENT 1 (Re-assessment of Appendicitis Evaluation during laparoscopic appendectomy: Do we End a Non-standardized Treatment approach and habit?): peritoneal irrigation during laparoscopic appendectomy-does the grade of contamination matter? A prospective multicenter resident-based evaluation of a new classification system.REsiDENT 1（腹腔镜阑尾切除术中阑尾炎评估的重新评估：我们是否结束了非标准化的治疗方法和习惯？）：腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的腹腔灌洗-污染程度是否重要？一种新分类系统的基于住院医师的前瞻性多中心评估。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 May 30;14:25. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0243-4. eCollection 2019.