Lin Chin-Kai, Meng Ling-Fu, Yu Ya-Wen, Chen Che-Kuo, Li Kuan-Hua
Program of Early Intervention, Department of Early Childhood Education, National Taichung University of Education, Taichung, Taiwan.
Department of Occupational Therapy and Graduate of Institute of Behavioral Science, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Feb;35(2):512-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.007. Epub 2013 Dec 25.
Most studies treat fine motor as one subscale in a developmental test, hence, further factor analysis of fine motor has not been conducted. In fact, fine motor has been treated as a multi-dimensional domain from both clinical and theoretical perspectives, and therefore to know its factors would be valuable. The aim of this study is to analyze the internal consistency and factor validity of the Contextual Fine Motor Questionnaire (CFMQ). Based on the ecological observation and literature, the Contextual Fine Motor Questionnaire (CFMQ) was developed and includes 5 subscales: Pen Control, Tool Use During Handicraft Activities, the Use of Dining Utensils, Connecting and Separating during Dressing and Undressing, and Opening Containers. The main purpose of this study is to establish the factorial validity of the CFMQ through conducting this factor analysis study. Among 1208 questionnaires, 904 were successfully completed. Data from the children's CFMQ submitted by primary care providers was analyzed, including 485 females (53.6%) and 419 males (46.4%) from grades 1 to 5, ranging in age from 82 to 167 months (M=113.9, SD=16.3). Cronbach's alpha was used to measure internal consistency and explorative factor analysis was applied to test the five factor structures within the CFMQ. Results showed that Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the CFMQ for 5 subscales ranged from .77 to .92 and all item-total correlations with corresponding subscales were larger than .4 except one item. The factor loading of almost all items classified to their factor was larger than .5 except 3 items. There were five factors, explaining a total of 62.59% variance for the CFMQ. In conclusion, the remaining 24 items in the 5 subscales of the CFMQ had appropriate internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity.
大多数研究将精细运动作为发育测试中的一个子量表,因此,尚未对精细运动进行进一步的因素分析。事实上,从临床和理论角度来看,精细运动都被视为一个多维度领域,因此了解其影响因素将很有价值。本研究的目的是分析情境精细运动问卷(CFMQ)的内部一致性和因素效度。基于生态观察和文献,编制了情境精细运动问卷(CFMQ),它包括5个子量表:笔控制、手工活动中的工具使用、餐具使用、穿衣和脱衣时的连接与分离,以及打开容器。本研究的主要目的是通过进行这项因素分析研究来确立CFMQ的因素效度。在1208份问卷中,904份成功完成。对初级保健提供者提交的儿童CFMQ数据进行了分析,包括1至5年级的485名女性(53.6%)和419名男性(46.4%),年龄在82至167个月之间(M=113.9,SD=16.3)。使用克朗巴哈系数来测量内部一致性,并应用探索性因素分析来检验CFMQ中的五因素结构。结果显示,CFMQ五个子量表的克朗巴哈系数在0.77至0.92之间,除一项外,所有项目与相应子量表的项目总分相关系数均大于0.4。除3个项目外,几乎所有归类到其因素的项目的因素负荷均大于0.5。有五个因素,共解释了CFMQ 62.59%的方差。总之,CFMQ五个子量表中的其余24个项目具有适当的内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。