Suppr超能文献

术前放疗对腹膜后肉瘤并不增加术后早期的发病率。

Preoperative radiation for retroperitoneal sarcoma is not associated with increased early postoperative morbidity.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2014 May;109(6):606-11. doi: 10.1002/jso.23534. Epub 2013 Dec 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Preoperative radiation (PR) in the management of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is controversial. Concern for increased perioperative morbidity may influence the decision to recommend PR. Here we compare 30-day morbidity and mortality (M + M) after resection of RPS with and without PR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing resection of RPS were identified using ACS NSQIP (2005-2011). Patients with known PR status within 90 days of operation were included. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with M + M.

RESULTS

Of 696 patients operated on for RPS, 70 (10%) underwent PR. PR patients were younger (mean 55 vs. 61 years), more frequently had hypoalbuminemia (<3 g/dl; 19% vs. 10%), concomitant kidney (29% vs. 18%), or pancreas resections (11% vs. 5%), longer operations (mean 327 vs. 253 min), and increased transfusion requirements (mean 4.1 vs. 2.1 units, each P < 0.05). Despite these differences, the M + M rate (31% with vs. 30% without PR, P = 0.75) was comparable between the two groups. After adjustment for confounders, no association was identified between PR and M + M.

CONCLUSIONS

In a national cohort of RPS patients, PR is infrequently utilized. Despite the increased prevalence of multiple risk factors, PR patients do not have an increased 30-day postoperative M + M.

摘要

背景与目的

在腹膜后肉瘤(RPS)的治疗中,术前放疗(PR)存在争议。对围手术期发病率增加的担忧可能会影响推荐 PR 的决策。在这里,我们比较了接受和不接受 PR 的 RPS 切除术后 30 天的发病率和死亡率(M+M)。

方法

使用 ACS NSQIP(2005-2011 年)确定接受 RPS 切除术的患者。将在手术 90 天内有明确 PR 状态的患者纳入研究。进行单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定与 M+M 相关的因素。

结果

在 696 例接受 RPS 手术的患者中,有 70 例(10%)接受了 PR。PR 患者年龄较小(平均 55 岁 vs. 61 岁),更常出现低白蛋白血症(<3 g/dl;19% vs. 10%)、同时进行肾脏(29% vs. 18%)或胰腺切除术(11% vs. 5%)、手术时间较长(平均 327 分钟 vs. 253 分钟)和输血需求增加(平均 4.1 单位 vs. 2.1 单位,均 P<0.05)。尽管存在这些差异,但两组之间的 M+M 发生率(接受 PR 治疗的患者为 31%,未接受 PR 治疗的患者为 30%,P=0.75)相当。在调整混杂因素后,PR 与 M+M 之间没有关联。

结论

在一个全国性的 RPS 患者队列中,PR 的应用频率较低。尽管存在多种危险因素的高发,但 PR 患者术后 30 天的死亡率并没有增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验