• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用阿拉伯语单词识别流畅度监测一年级阅读进展。

Using Arabic word identification fluency to monitor first-grade reading progress.

机构信息

Department of Counseling and Special Education, Mutah University, Al-Karak, Jordan.

出版信息

Dyslexia. 2014 May;20(2):167-74. doi: 10.1002/dys.1472. Epub 2013 Dec 27.

DOI:10.1002/dys.1472
PMID:24375873
Abstract

This study examined the applicability, reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the curriculum-based measurement word identification fluency (CBM WIF) measure in Jordanian students. A sample of 75 first-grade students, 50 average readers and 25 with reading difficulties, were recruited from two public primary schools. Results indicated that the CBM WIF is a reliable, valid and cost-effective measure. A 15-week trial demonstrated the effectiveness of using CBM WIF with the first-grade students. In addition, CBM WIF was a good predictor of grade point average in the native language. Moreover, students who were struggling with reading scored significantly lower on CBM WIF probes than did average readers. Results suggest that the CBM WIF measures may be useful for evaluating and predicting reading performance in Arabic.

摘要

本研究考察了课程本位测量字词识别流畅性测验(CBM WIF)阿拉伯语版在约旦学生中的适用性、信度和效度。从两所公立小学中招募了 75 名一年级学生、50 名平均阅读者和 25 名阅读困难者作为样本。结果表明,CBM WIF 是一种可靠、有效且具有成本效益的测量工具。为期 15 周的试验表明,该测量工具对一年级学生有效。此外,CBM WIF 是母语平均分的良好预测指标。此外,阅读困难的学生在 CBM WIF 探针上的得分明显低于平均阅读者。结果表明,CBM WIF 测量可能有助于评估和预测阿拉伯语的阅读表现。

相似文献

1
Using Arabic word identification fluency to monitor first-grade reading progress.利用阿拉伯语单词识别流畅度监测一年级阅读进展。
Dyslexia. 2014 May;20(2):167-74. doi: 10.1002/dys.1472. Epub 2013 Dec 27.
2
Does CBM maze assess reading comprehension in 8-9-year olds at-risk for dyslexia?CBM 迷宫是否能评估 8-9 岁有阅读障碍风险的儿童的阅读理解能力?
Dyslexia. 2021 May;27(2):265-274. doi: 10.1002/dys.1679. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Monitoring early first-grade reading progress: a comparison of two measures.监测一年级早期阅读进展:两种测量方法的比较
J Learn Disabil. 2014 May-Jun;47(3):254-70. doi: 10.1177/0022219412454455. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
4
The relationship between different measures of oral reading fluency and reading comprehension in second-grade students who evidence different oral reading fluency difficulties.不同阅读流畅度测量指标与具有不同阅读流畅度困难的二年级学生阅读理解之间的关系。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2010 Jul;41(3):340-8. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0093). Epub 2010 Apr 26.
5
The Critical Role of Word Reading as a Predictor of Response to Intervention.阅读能力对干预反应的关键作用。
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Nov/Dec;53(6):415-427. doi: 10.1177/0022219419891412. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
6
First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status.一年级认知能力是阅读理解和残疾状况的长期预测指标。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):217-31. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442154.
7
A comparison of nonsense-word fluency and curriculum-based measurement of reading to measure response to phonics instruction.比较无意义单词流畅性与基于课程的阅读测评以衡量对自然拼读教学的反应。
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Dec;33(4):573-581. doi: 10.1037/spq0000237. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
8
The effect of a multicomponent literacy instruction model on literacy growth for kindergartners and first-grade students in Chile.智利的一项多元文化读写教学模式对幼儿园和一年级学生读写能力发展的影响。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(5):747-61. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.719628. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Examining Predictive Validity of Oral Reading Fluency Slope in Upper Elementary Grades Using Quantile Regression.使用分位数回归检验小学高年级口语阅读流利度斜率的预测效度。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Nov/Dec;51(6):565-577. doi: 10.1177/0022219417719887. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
10
Early grade curriculum-based reading measures for students with intellectual disability.针对智障学生的早期基于课程的阅读测评
J Intellect Disabil. 2015 Dec;19(4):311-25. doi: 10.1177/1744629515574812. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive validity of early and mid-year literacy assessments for end-of-year word reading fluency.年初和年中读写能力评估对年末单词阅读流畅性的预测效度。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 25;20(6):e0327242. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327242. eCollection 2025.