Guo Changcheng, Yang Bin, Gu Wenyu, Peng Bo, Xia Shengqiang, Yang Fengqiang, Wen Deyi, Geng Jiang, Zhang Yuanyuan, Zheng Junhua
Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 20;8(12):e82591. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082591. eCollection 2013.
While Resin-iferatoxin (RTX) has been widely used for patients with storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), its clinical efficiency hasn't yet been well evaluated. A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the exact roles of intravesical RTX for the treatment of storage LUTS in patients with either interstitial cystitis (IC) or detrusor overactivity (DO).
A meta-analysis of RTX treatment was performed through a comprehensive search of the literature. In total, 2,332 records were initially recruited, 1,907 from Elsevier, 207 from Medline and 218 from the Web of Science. No records were retrieved from the Embase or Cochrane Library. Seven trials with 355 patients were included and one trial was excluded because of the lack of extractable data. The analyses were all performed using RevMan 5.1 and MIX 2.0.
Bladder pain was significantly reduced after RTX therapy in patients with either IC or DO. The average decrease of the visual an alogue pain scale was 0.42 after RTX treatment (p = 0.02). The maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) was significantly increased in patients with DO (MCC increase, 53.36 ml, p = 0.006) but not in those with IC (MCC increase, -19.1 ml, p = 0.35). No significant improvement in urinary frequency, nocturia, incontinence or the first involuntary detrusor contraction (FDC) was noted after RTX therapy (p = 0.06, p = 0.52, p = 0.19 and p = 0.41, respectively).
RTX could significantly reduce bladder pain in patients with either IC or DO, and increase MCC in patients with DO; however, no significant improvement was observed in frequency, nocturia, incontinence or FDC. Given the limitations in the small patient size and risk of bias in the included trials, great caution should be taken when intravesical RTX is used before a large, multicenter, well-designed random control trial with a long-term follow-up is carried out to further assess the clinical efficacy of RTX in in patients with storage LUTS.
尽管树脂毒素(RTX)已广泛应用于储尿期下尿路症状(LUTS)患者,但尚未对其临床疗效进行充分评估。本研究进行了一项荟萃分析,以评估膀胱内注射RTX治疗间质性膀胱炎(IC)或逼尿肌过度活动(DO)患者储尿期LUTS的确切作用。
通过全面检索文献对RTX治疗进行荟萃分析。最初共纳入2332条记录,其中1907条来自爱思唯尔数据库,207条来自医学期刊数据库,218条来自科学引文索引数据库。未从荷兰医学文摘数据库或考克兰图书馆检索到相关记录。纳入7项试验共355例患者,排除1项因缺乏可提取数据的试验。所有分析均使用RevMan 5.1和MIX 2.0软件进行。
RTX治疗后,IC或DO患者的膀胱疼痛均显著减轻。RTX治疗后视觉模拟疼痛量表平均下降0.42(p = 0.02)。DO患者的最大膀胱测压容量(MCC)显著增加(MCC增加53.36 ml,p = 0.006),而IC患者则无显著增加(MCC增加-19.1 ml,p = 0.35)。RTX治疗后,尿频、夜尿、尿失禁或首次逼尿肌不自主收缩(FDC)均无显著改善(p分别为0.06、0.52、0.19和0.41)。
RTX可显著减轻IC或DO患者的膀胱疼痛,并增加DO患者的MCC;然而,在尿频、夜尿、尿失禁或FDC方面未观察到显著改善。鉴于纳入试验的样本量较小及存在偏倚风险的局限性,在进行大规模、多中心、设计良好且长期随访的随机对照试验以进一步评估RTX治疗储尿期LUTS患者的临床疗效之前,使用膀胱内注射RTX时应格外谨慎。