Suppr超能文献

浸润性小叶癌乳房切除术与保乳手术的比较:15年结果

Comparison of mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery in invasive lobular carcinoma: 15-Year results.

作者信息

Fodor János, Major Tibor, Tóth József, Sulyok Zoltán, Polgár Csaba

机构信息

Department of Radiotherapy, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth Gy. u. 7-9, Budapest H-1122, Hungary.

Department of Pathology, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2011 Jul 27;16(6):227-31. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2011.06.005. eCollection 2011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Invasive lobular cancer (ILC) is biologically distinct from invasive ductal cancer and there is disagreement regarding appropriate local management of this disease.

AIM

The current study reports long term results comparing mastectomy with breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in the treatment of ILC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study includes 235 women with ILC treated between 1983 and 1987. All of them underwent axillary dissection and either mastectomy (n = 163) or BCS (n = 72). 50 Gy adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) was given for 53 BCS and 81 mastectomy patients. The BCS group was compared with the mastectomy group.

RESULTS

Patients treated with mastectomy or BCS had a similar outcome at 15 years with regard to distant metastasis-free (62% vs. 70%; p, 0.2017) and breast cancer-specific (62% vs. 70%; p, 0.1728) survival. In the BCS group the actuarial rate of ipsilateral in breast recurrences was 10% with and 53% without RT at 15 years (relative risk [RR], 0.10; p < 0.0001). In the mastectomy group the actuarial rate of chest wall recurrences was 16% with and 13% without RT at 15 years (RR, 1.45; p, 0.3965). Isolated ipsilateral in breast recurrence did not (RR, 1.73; p, 0.2767) but isolated chest-wall recurrence did (RR, 2.65; p, 0.0089) adversely affect cause-specific survival.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer specific survival is not affected by the type of surgical treatment. BCS and RT is a safe option to control local disease in patients with ILC.

摘要

背景

浸润性小叶癌(ILC)在生物学上与浸润性导管癌不同,对于该疾病的适当局部治疗存在分歧。

目的

本研究报告了在ILC治疗中,比较乳房切除术与保乳手术(BCS)的长期结果。

材料与方法

研究纳入了1983年至1987年间接受治疗的235例ILC女性患者。她们均接受了腋窝清扫术,其中163例行乳房切除术,72例行BCS。53例BCS患者和81例乳房切除术患者接受了50 Gy的辅助放疗(RT)。将BCS组与乳房切除术组进行比较。

结果

接受乳房切除术或BCS治疗的患者在15年时,无远处转移生存率(62%对70%;p,0.2017)和乳腺癌特异性生存率(62%对70%;p,0.1728)相似。在BCS组中,15年时接受RT和未接受RT的同侧乳房复发精算率分别为10%和53%(相对风险[RR],0.10;p<0.0001)。在乳房切除术组中,15年时接受RT和未接受RT的胸壁复发精算率分别为16%和13%(RR,1.45;p,0.3965)。孤立的同侧乳房复发未(RR,1.73;p,0.2767)但孤立的胸壁复发(RR,2.65;p,0.0089)对病因特异性生存率有不利影响。

结论

乳腺癌特异性生存率不受手术治疗类型的影响。BCS联合RT是控制ILC患者局部疾病的安全选择。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
A clinical perspective on oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.肿瘤整形保乳手术的临床视角
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Sep 28;4:29. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-23-40. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验