Moore M M, Borossa G, Imbrie J Z, Fechner R E, Harvey J A, Slingluff C L, Adams R B, Hanks J B
Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0709, USA.
Ann Surg. 2000 Jun;231(6):877-82. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200006000-00012.
To determine whether infiltrating lobular carcinoma (ILC) is associated with high positive-margin rates for single-stage lumpectomy procedures, and to define clinical, mammographic, or histologic characteristics of ILC that might influence the positive-margin rate, thereby affecting treatment decisions.
Infiltrating lobular cancer represents approximately 10% of all invasive breast carcinomas and is often poorly defined on gross examination.
A group of 47 patients with biopsy-proven ILC undergoing breast-conservation therapy (BCT) at the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center between 1975 and 1999 was compared with a group of 150 patients with infiltrating ductal cancer undergoing BCT during the same time period. The pathology of the lumpectomy specimen was reviewed for each patient to confirm surgical margin status. Office and surgical notes as well as mammography reports were examined to determine whether the lesions were deemed palpable before and during surgery. Patients were stratified according to age, family history, tumor size, tumor location, and histologic features of the tumor.
The incidence of positive margins was greater in the ILC group compared with the infiltrating ductal cancer group. Patient age, family history, and preoperative palpability of the tumor did not correlate with surgical margin status. Of the mammographic features identified, including spiculated mass, calcifications, architectural distortion, and other densities, only architectural distortion predicted positive surgical margin status. Tumor grade, tumor size, lymph node status, and receptor status were not predictive of surgical margin status.
For patients with ILC, BCT is feasible, but these patients are at high risk of tumor-positive resection margins (51% incidence) after the initial resection. Only the mammographic finding of architectural distortion was identified as a preoperative marker reliably identifying a subgroup of ILC patients at especially high risk for a positive surgical margin. For all patients with ILC considering BCT, careful counseling about the potential need for a second procedure to treat the positive margin should be included in the treatment discussion.
确定小叶原位癌(ILC)是否与单阶段乳房肿瘤切除术的高切缘阳性率相关,并明确可能影响切缘阳性率从而影响治疗决策的ILC的临床、乳房X线摄影或组织学特征。
小叶原位癌约占所有浸润性乳腺癌的10%,在大体检查中通常边界不清。
将1975年至1999年间在弗吉尼亚大学健康科学中心接受保乳治疗(BCT)且活检证实为ILC的47例患者与同期接受BCT的150例浸润性导管癌患者进行比较。对每位患者乳房肿瘤切除标本的病理进行复查以确认手术切缘状态。检查门诊和手术记录以及乳房X线摄影报告,以确定病变在手术前和手术期间是否可触及。根据患者年龄、家族史、肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置和肿瘤的组织学特征进行分层。
与浸润性导管癌组相比,ILC组切缘阳性的发生率更高。患者年龄、家族史和肿瘤术前可触及性与手术切缘状态无关。在确定的乳房X线摄影特征中,包括毛刺状肿块、钙化、结构扭曲和其他密度影,只有结构扭曲可预测手术切缘阳性状态。肿瘤分级、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态和受体状态均不能预测手术切缘状态。
对于ILC患者,BCT是可行的,但这些患者在初次切除后肿瘤切缘阳性的风险较高(发生率为51%)。只有乳房X线摄影发现的结构扭曲被确定为术前标志物,可可靠地识别出手术切缘阳性风险特别高的ILC患者亚组。对于所有考虑BCT的ILC患者,在治疗讨论中应仔细告知其可能需要二次手术来处理切缘阳性的情况。