• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陷入无意识的分裂:对“DSM-5 中人格障碍的讽刺命运”的评论。

Caught in an unconscious split: commentary on "the ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5".

机构信息

University of Michigan Medical School.

出版信息

Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):350-1. doi: 10.1037/per0000047.

DOI:10.1037/per0000047
PMID:24378162
Abstract

Silk comments that "The Ironic Fate of the Personality Disorders in DSM-5" (see record 2013-45025-004) is a clearly written, accurate account of events attendant to the development and eventual rejection by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) of the Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group's (PPDWG's) proposal for a substantially revised system for diagnosing personality disorders (PD) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Silk appreciates the authors' dispassionate account of what was a difficult and, at times, affect-laden process for not only those in the PPDWG but also other clinicians and researchers in the wider PD community.

摘要

丝绸评论说,“人格障碍在 DSM-5 中的讽刺命运”(参见记录 2013-45025-004)是对人格和人格障碍工作组(PPDWG)为在《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》(第 5 版;DSM-5;美国精神病学协会,2013)中诊断人格障碍(PD)而提出的实质性修订系统的发展和最终被美国精神病学协会(APA)拒绝的相关事件的清晰准确的描述。丝绸赞赏作者对这一过程的冷静描述,这不仅对 PPDWG 中的人,而且对更广泛的 PD 社区中的其他临床医生和研究人员来说,这都是一个艰难且有时充满情感的过程。

相似文献

1
Caught in an unconscious split: commentary on "the ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5".陷入无意识的分裂:对“DSM-5 中人格障碍的讽刺命运”的评论。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):350-1. doi: 10.1037/per0000047.
2
What is ironic about wanting empirical support to justify changes in diagnostic criteria? Commentary on "the ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5".想要实证支持来证明诊断标准的改变是合理的,这难道不具有讽刺意味吗?评“DSM-5 中人格障碍的讽刺命运”。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):352-3. doi: 10.1037/per0000048.
3
Personality Disorders in DSM-5: A Commentary on the Perceived Process and Outcome of the Proposal of the Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版中的人格障碍:关于人格与人格障碍工作组提议的认知过程及结果的评论
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2016 Sep-Oct;24(5):e15-21. doi: 10.1097/HRP.0000000000000094.
4
When is it time to move on? Rejoinder for "the ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5".何时该继续前进?对“DSM-5 中人格障碍的讽刺命运”的回应。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):354. doi: 10.1037/per0000054.
5
The ironic fate of the personality disorders in DSM-5.DSM-5 中人格障碍的讽刺命运。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):342-9. doi: 10.1037/per0000029.
6
Missed opportunities in the DSM-5 Section III personality disorder model: commentary on "personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era".错失在 DSM-5 第三部分人格障碍模型中的机会:对“人格障碍是 DSM-5.0 后的先锋”的评论。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):365-6. doi: 10.1037/per0000043.
7
Anatomy of a debacle: commentary on "seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM-5".一场惨败的剖析:对“为 DSM-5 中人格障碍的未来修订寻求清晰性”的评论。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):377-8. doi: 10.1037/per0000046.
8
A critique of Gunderson's views of DSM-5: commentary on "seeking clarity for future revisions of the personality disorders in DSM-5".对冈德森对 DSM-5 观点的批评:对“为 DSM-5 人格障碍的未来修订寻求明确性”的评论。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):379-80. doi: 10.1037/per0000050.
9
In through the out door: a commentary on "personality disorders are the vanguard of the post-DSM-5.0 era".从门外进来:对“人格障碍是 DSM-5.0 后时代的先锋”的评论。
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):363-4. doi: 10.1037/per0000044.
10
Personality disorders and the DSM-5: Scientific and extra-scientific factors in the maintenance of the status quo.人格障碍与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版:维持现状的科学与非科学因素
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;50(2):119-27. doi: 10.1177/0004867415595872. Epub 2015 Jul 24.