University of Kentucky.
Personal Disord. 2013 Oct;4(4):392. doi: 10.1037/per0000053.
Presents a rejoinder to comments made by Oltmanns (see record 2013-45025-017) and Markon (see record 2013-45025-018) on the original article by Widiger (see record 2013-45025-016) regarding personality disorders in the DSM-5. Widiger comments that one of the texts he enjoys a great deal is Jerry Wiggins' Paradigms of Personality Assessment. Widiger notes that Wiggins presents within this book five fundamentally different theoretical models for personality assessment (e.g., psychodynamic and trait). Widiger further comments that what is evident throughout is that Jerry valued, and loved, all five perspectives. He favored none of them and supported all of them. In Widiger's opinion, this perspective would be worthwhile for the authors of the next diagnostic revision. This means being less antagonistic (e.g., dismissive of a research literature), and also less antagonizing (e.g., ignoring a research literature). Widiger remarks that all voices must be heard, and most importantly, appreciated.
回应了 Oltmanns（见文献[2013-45025-017]）和 Markon（见文献[2013-45025-018]）对 Widiger（见文献[2013-45025-016]）关于 DSM-5 中人格障碍的原始文章的评论。Widiger 评论说，他非常喜欢的一篇文章是 Jerry Wiggins 的《人格评估范式》。Widiger 指出，Wiggins 在这本书中提出了五种截然不同的人格评估理论模型（例如，精神分析和特质）。Widiger 进一步评论说，贯穿全书始终的是 Jerry 重视并热爱所有这五个视角。他不偏袒任何一个，也不支持任何一个。在 Widiger 看来，这一观点对下一次诊断修订的作者来说是值得借鉴的。这意味着减少对抗性（例如，轻视某一研究文献），同时也减少挑衅性（例如，忽视某一研究文献）。Widiger 指出，所有声音都必须被听到，最重要的是，都必须被欣赏。
