Miller Michael A, Ganesan Asha Purnima V, Eisenlohr Laurence C
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Thomas Jefferson University , Philadelphia, PA , USA.
Front Immunol. 2013 Dec 16;4:464. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00464.
The standard model of Major Histocompatibility Complex class II (MHCII)-restricted antigen processing depicts a straightforward, linear pathway: internalized antigens are converted into peptides that load in a chaperone dependent manner onto nascent MHCII in the late endosome, the complexes subsequently trafficking to the cell surface for recognition by CD4(+) T cells (TCD4+). Several variations on this theme, both moderate and radical, have come to light but these alternatives have remained peripheral, the conventional pathway generally presumed to be the primary driver of TCD4+ responses. Here we continue to press for the conceptual repositioning of these alternatives toward the center while proposing that MHCII processing be thought of less in terms of discrete pathways and more in terms of a network whose major and minor conduits are variable depending upon many factors, including the epitope, the nature of the antigen, the source of the antigen, and the identity of the antigen-presenting cell.
主要组织相容性复合体II类(MHCII)限制的抗原加工的标准模型描述了一条直接的线性途径:内化的抗原被转化为肽,这些肽以伴侣依赖性方式加载到晚期内体中的新生MHCII上,随后这些复合物运输到细胞表面以供CD4(+) T细胞(TCD4+)识别。关于这个主题有几种温和和激进的变体已经被发现,但这些替代途径一直处于边缘地位,传统途径通常被认为是TCD4+反应的主要驱动因素。在这里,我们继续推动将这些替代途径在概念上重新定位到中心位置,同时提出MHCII加工不应再从离散途径的角度来考虑,而应更多地从一个网络的角度来考虑,其主要和次要途径会根据许多因素而变化,包括表位、抗原的性质、抗原的来源以及抗原呈递细胞的身份。