Michal Krčma, Daniela Čechurová, Jitka Brožová, Zdeněk Jankovec, Silvie Lacigová, Michal Žourek, Zdeněk Rušavý, Diabetology Centre, 1 Department of Clinic Medicine, Teaching Hospital and Medical Faculty Charles University, 32300 Plzen, Czech Republic.
World J Diabetes. 2013 Dec 15;4(6):372-7. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v4.i6.372.
To examine skin perfusion in dependency on insulinemia in healthy subjects.
All volunteers were informed in detail about the procedures and signed informed consent. The protocol of this study was approved by the ethical committee. In our study, a two stage hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was performed, with insulinemia 100 and 250 mIU/mL and glycemia 5.0 mmol/L (3% standard deviation). Before the clamp and in steady states, microcirculation was measured by laser Doppler flowmetry and transcutaneous oximetry and energy expenditure was measured by indirect calorimetry. Results (average and standard deviation) were evaluated with paired t-test.
Physiological (50 mIU/L) insulinemia led to higher perfusion in both tests; hyperemia after heating to 44%-1848% (984-2046) vs 1599% (801-1836), P < 0.05, half time of reaching peak perfusion after occlusion release 1.2 s (0.9-2.6) vs 4.9 s (1.8-11.4), P < 0.05. Supraphysiological (150 mIU/L) insulinemia led to even higher perfusion in both tests; hyperemia after heating to 44%-1937% (1177-2488) vs 1599% (801-1836), P < 0.005, half time to reach peak perfusion after occlusion release 1.0 s (0.7-1.1) vs 4.9 s (1.8-11.4), P < 0.005. A statistically significant increase occurred in tissue oxygenation in both insulinemia. The difference in perfusion and oxygenation between physiological and supraphysiological hyperinsulinemia was not statistically significant.
The post occlusive hyperemia test in accordance with heating test showed significantly increasing skin perfusion in the course of artificial hyperinsulinemia. This effect rises non-linearly with increasing insulinemia. Dependency on the dose was not statistically significant.
研究健康受试者的血糖与胰岛素依赖性皮肤灌注。
所有志愿者均详细了解了操作过程,并签署了知情同意书。本研究方案获得了伦理委员会的批准。在本研究中,我们进行了两阶段高胰岛素-正常血糖钳夹,胰岛素浓度分别为 100 和 250mIU/ml,血糖浓度为 5.0mmol/L(3%标准差)。在钳夹和稳态之前,使用激光多普勒流量仪和经皮血氧仪测量微循环,通过间接热量法测量能量消耗。使用配对 t 检验评估结果(平均值和标准差)。
生理浓度(50mIU/L)的胰岛素使两种测试中的灌注均增加;加热至 44%-1848%(984-2046)后出现充血,比 1599%(801-1836)高 1599%(801-1836),p<0.05,闭塞释放后达到峰值灌注的半时 1.2s(0.9-2.6)比 4.9s(1.8-11.4)短,p<0.05。超生理浓度(150mIU/L)的胰岛素使两种测试中的灌注均进一步增加;加热至 44%-1937%(1177-2488)后出现充血,比 1599%(801-1836)高 1599%(801-1836),p<0.005,闭塞释放后达到峰值灌注的半时 1.0s(0.7-1.1)比 4.9s(1.8-11.4)短,p<0.005。两种胰岛素血症下组织氧合均有统计学意义的增加。生理和超生理高胰岛素血症之间的灌注和氧合差异无统计学意义。
与加热试验一致的闭塞后充血试验显示,在人工高胰岛素血症过程中皮肤灌注明显增加。这种效应随胰岛素浓度的增加呈非线性增加。对剂量的依赖性没有统计学意义。