Chen Ni-Ni, Han Mei, Yang Hong, Yang Guo-Yan, Wang Yu-Yi, Wu Xiao-Ke, Liu Jian-Ping
Center for Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, No, 11 Bei San Huan Dong Lu, Beijing, Chaoyang District, China.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014 Jan 2;14:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-2.
BACKGROUND: Guizhi Fuling Formula is widely applied for uterine fibroids in China. Many clinical trials are reported. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of Guizhi Fuling Formula for the treatment of uterine fibroids. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and four Chinese databases were searched through May 2013. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that tested Guizhi Fuling Formula for uterine fibroids, compared with no intervention, placebo, pharmaceutical medication, or other Chinese patent medicines approved by the State Food and Drug Administration of China. Authors extracted data and assessed the quality independently. We applied RevMan 5.2.0 software to analyse data of included randomised trials. RESULTS: A total of 38 RCTs involving 3816 participants were identified. The methodological quality of the included trials was generally poor. Meta-analyses demonstrated that Guizhi Fuling Formula plus mifepristone were more effective than mifepristone alone in reducing the volume of fibroids (in total volume of multiple fibroids, MD -19.41 cm(3), 95% CI -28.68 to -10.14; in average volume of multiple fibroids, MD -1.00 cm(3), 95% CI -1.23 to -0.76; in average volume of maximum fibroids, MD -3.35 cm(3), 95% CI -4.84 to -1.87, I(2) = 93%, random effects model). Guizhi Fuling Formula significantly improved symptoms of dysmenorrhea either when it was used alone (RR 2.27, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.97) or in combination with mifepristone (RR 2.35, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.82). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Guizhi Fuling Formula appears to have additional benefit based on mifepristone treatment in reducing volume of fibroids. However, due to high risk of bias of the trials, we could not draw confirmative conclusions on its benefit. Future clinical trials should be well-designed and avoid the issues that are identified in this study.
背景:在中国,桂枝茯苓方被广泛应用于子宫肌瘤的治疗。已有许多临床试验报告。本研究评估了桂枝茯苓方治疗子宫肌瘤的疗效和安全性。 方法:检索了截至2013年5月的PubMed、Cochrane CENTRAL、EMBASE以及四个中文数据库。我们纳入了测试桂枝茯苓方治疗子宫肌瘤的随机对照试验(RCT),并与无干预、安慰剂、药物治疗或中国国家食品药品监督管理总局批准的其他中成药进行比较。作者独立提取数据并评估质量。我们应用RevMan 5.2.0软件分析纳入的随机试验数据。 结果:共识别出38项RCT,涉及3816名参与者。纳入试验的方法学质量总体较差。荟萃分析表明,桂枝茯苓方联合米非司酮在缩小肌瘤体积方面比单用米非司酮更有效(在多个肌瘤的总体积方面,MD -19.41 cm³,95% CI -28.68至-10.14;在多个肌瘤的平均体积方面,MD -1.00 cm³,95% CI -1.23至-0.76;在最大肌瘤的平均体积方面,MD -3.35 cm³,95% CI -4.84至-1.87,I² = 93%,随机效应模型)。桂枝茯苓方单独使用(RR 2.27,95% CI 1.04至4.
BMC Complement Altern Med. 2014-1-2
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-4-30
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-4-26
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015-3-20
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025-4-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017-11-15
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016-1-14
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012-8-15
Health Syst (Basingstoke). 2022-12-19
Int J Mol Sci. 2023-11-4
J Tradit Chin Med. 2022-10
Front Pharmacol. 2022-6-22
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022-4-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-4-30
J Ethnopharmacol. 2008-10-30
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008-8
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008-8
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2008-8
J Pharmacol Sci. 2007-9
Science. 2005-6-10