Roberts Pamela S, Nuño Miriam, Sherman Dale, Asher Arash, Wertheimer Jeffrey, Riggs Richard V, Patil Chirag G
Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8631 West Third St, Suite 915 East, Los Angeles, CA 90048∗.
Center for Neurosurgical Outcomes Research, Maxine Dunitz Neurosurgical Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA(†).
PM R. 2014 Jun;6(6):514-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.12.007. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
To examine the impact of an inpatient rehabilitation program on functional improvement and survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) who underwent surgical resection of the brain tumor.
A retrospective cohort study of newly diagnosed patients with GBM between 2003 and 2010, with survival data updated through January 23, 2013.
An urban academic nonprofit medical center that included acute medical and inpatient rehabilitation.
Data for newly diagnosed patients with GBM were examined; of these patients, 100 underwent inpatient rehabilitation after resection, and 312 did not undergo inpatient rehabilitation.
Overall functional improvement and survival time for patients who participated in the inpatient rehabilitation program.
A total of 89 patients (93.7%) who underwent inpatient rehabilitation improved in functional status from admission to discharge, with the highest gain observed in mobility (96.8%), followed by self-care (88.4%), communication/social cognition (75.8%), and sphincter control (50.5%). The median overall survival among inpatient rehabilitation patients was 14.3 versus 17.9 months for patients who did not undergo inpatient rehabilitation (P = .03). However, after we adjusted for age, extent of resection, and Karnofsky Performance Status Scale scores, we found no statistical difference in the survival rate between patients who did and did not undergo inpatient rehabilitation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; P = .16). Among the patients who underwent inpatient rehabilitation, older age (HR, 2.24; P = .0006), a low degree of resection (HR, 1.67; P = .02), and lack of a Stupp regimen (HR, 1.71; P = .05) were associated with greater hazard of mortality.
Patients who undergo inpatient rehabilitation demonstrate significant functional improvements, primarily in the mobility domain. Confounder adjusted multivariate analysis showed no survival difference between patients who did and did not undergo inpatient rehabilitation; this finding suggests that a structured inpatient rehabilitation program may level the survival field in lower-functioning patients who otherwise may be faced with a dismal prognosis.
探讨住院康复计划对新诊断的多形性胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者行脑肿瘤手术切除后的功能改善及生存情况的影响。
对2003年至2010年新诊断的GBM患者进行回顾性队列研究,生存数据更新至2013年1月23日。
一家城市学术非营利性医疗中心,包括急性医疗和住院康复服务。
检查新诊断GBM患者的数据;其中,100例患者在切除术后接受了住院康复治疗,312例患者未接受住院康复治疗。
参与住院康复计划患者的总体功能改善情况和生存时间。
总共89例(93.7%)接受住院康复治疗的患者从入院到出院功能状态得到改善,其中运动功能改善最为明显(96.8%),其次是自我护理(88.4%)、沟通/社会认知(75.8%)和括约肌控制(50.5%)。住院康复患者的中位总生存期为14.3个月,未接受住院康复治疗的患者为17.9个月(P = 0.03)。然而,在对年龄、切除范围和卡氏功能状态量表评分进行校正后,我们发现接受和未接受住院康复治疗的患者生存率无统计学差异(风险比[HR],0.84;P = 0.16)。在接受住院康复治疗的患者中,年龄较大(HR,2.24;P = 0.0006)、切除程度低(HR,1.67;P = 0.02)以及未采用Stupp方案(HR,1.71;P = 0.05)与更高的死亡风险相关。
接受住院康复治疗的患者功能有显著改善,主要在运动领域。经混杂因素校正的多变量分析显示,接受和未接受住院康复治疗的患者生存率无差异;这一发现表明,结构化的住院康复计划可能使功能较低、否则预后可能较差的患者的生存情况更加均衡。