Suppr超能文献

采用简化粘结工艺的CAD/CAM全冠的抗疲劳性能

Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process.

作者信息

Carvalho Adriana O, Bruzi Greciana, Giannini Marcelo, Magne Pascal

机构信息

Graduate student, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba School of Dentistry, Campinas State University, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.

Graduate student, Department of Operative Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.

出版信息

J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Apr;111(4):310-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.020. Epub 2014 Jan 3.

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Various computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials are available to fabricate complete crowns. The type of material may have an effect on the longevity of these restorations.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the fatigue resistance, load-to-failure, failure mode, and antagonistic wear of complete molar computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crowns made of resin nanoceramic (RNC), feldspathic glass ceramic (FEL), or lithium disilicate (LD) placed with a simplified cementation process.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-five molars received a standardized complete crown preparation and were restored with CAD/CAM crowns (1.5-mm thickness, n=15) made of RNC, FEL, and LD. After cementation, the restorations were submitted to cyclic isometric loading: 200 (×5000), 400, 600, 800, 1000, 1200, and 1400 N at a maximum of 30 000 cycles each. Surviving specimens were axially loaded until failure or to a maximum load of 4500 N. The specimens were analyzed as to failure mode: catastrophic, possibly repairable, and repairable. The groups were compared by using the life table survival analysis and the t test (α=.05).

RESULTS

All the specimens survived the fatigue process until the 800-N step. The survival rate of RNC was 80%, LD 93.3%, and FEL 6.6%. The survival of RNC and LD crowns did not differ from each other but exceeded that of FEL. Postfatigue load-to-failure test was 2500 N (FEL), 3122 N (RNC), and 3237 N (LD). No catastrophic failure occurred in the fatigue test, whereas all of the specimens in the load-to-failure test exhibited catastrophic fractures. Crowns made of RNC seemed to generate the least amount of antagonistic wear.

CONCLUSIONS

Posterior crowns made of RNC and LD were not statistically different, and both had significantly higher fatigue resistance than FEL. All materials survived beyond the normal range of masticatory forces, and all failures were possibly re-restorable except those in the load-to-failure test. RNC crowns seemed to cause less wear of the antagonist.

摘要

问题陈述

有多种计算机辅助设计与计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)材料可用于制作全冠。材料类型可能会影响这些修复体的使用寿命。

目的

评估采用简化粘结工艺制作的由树脂纳米陶瓷(RNC)、长石质玻璃陶瓷(FEL)或二硅酸锂(LD)制成的磨牙全冠的抗疲劳性、破坏载荷、破坏模式和对颌磨损情况。

材料与方法

45颗磨牙接受标准化全冠预备,并用由RNC、FEL和LD制成的CAD/CAM全冠(厚度1.5毫米,n = 15)进行修复。粘结后,修复体接受循环等长加载:分别为200(×5000)、400、600、800、1000、1200和1400牛,每组最多30000次循环。存活的标本进行轴向加载直至破坏或达到4500牛的最大载荷。对标本的破坏模式进行分析:灾难性、可能可修复和可修复。采用寿命表生存分析和t检验对各组进行比较(α = 0.05)。

结果

所有标本在疲劳过程中均存活至800牛加载步骤。RNC的生存率为80%,LD为93.3%,FEL为6.6%。RNC和LD全冠的生存率彼此无差异,但均超过FEL。疲劳后破坏载荷测试结果为:FEL为2500牛,RNC为3122牛,LD为3237牛。疲劳测试中未发生灾难性破坏,而破坏载荷测试中的所有标本均出现灾难性骨折。由RNC制成的全冠似乎产生的对颌磨损量最少。

结论

由RNC和LD制成的后牙全冠在统计学上无差异,且两者的抗疲劳性均显著高于FEL。所有材料在超过正常咀嚼力范围后仍存活,除破坏载荷测试中的标本外,所有破坏情况可能均可再次修复。RNC全冠似乎对颌磨损较少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验