the Department of Family Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Portland.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Jan-Feb;27(1):8-10. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2014.01.130296.
How can we study and quantify potential value that may be added by having primary care specialists (PCSs) from both family medicine and internal medicine provide preventive care services for women? Does seeing one's personal physician (PCP) make a difference? Early answers come from the study by Cohen and Coco in this issue: "Do physicians address other medical problems during preventive gynecologic visits?" Their assessment of a nationally representative sample of preventive gynecological visits uses self-reported data from the physicians to tell us "yes" and to quantify to what extent by specialty, region, and PCP status. This sampling of the content of women's preventive health visits allows us to get a flavor for how the majority of PCSs provide comprehensive care for concomitant acute and chronic issues in the context of individual preventive care visits. Patients are unlikely to parse their presenting concerns into the acute or chronic or preventive categories. The practice of addressing multiple issues during one visit improves the efficiency of addressing patient concerns. This may be a key to the special flavor of a true patient-centered medical home.
我们如何研究和量化家庭医学和内科的初级保健专家(PCS)提供预防保健服务可为女性带来的潜在价值?看自己的私人医生(PCP)有区别吗?科恩和可可(Cohen and Coco)在本期杂志中的研究给出了早期答案:“医生在进行预防性妇科就诊时是否会解决其他医疗问题?”他们对全国代表性的预防性妇科就诊样本的评估使用了来自医生的自我报告数据,告诉我们“是”,并按专业、地区和 PCP 身份量化了程度。对女性预防保健就诊内容的抽样使我们能够了解大多数 PCS 如何在个人预防保健就诊的背景下为急性和慢性并存问题提供全面护理。患者不太可能将其出现的问题分解为急性、慢性或预防类别。在一次就诊中解决多个问题的做法提高了解决患者问题的效率。这可能是真正以患者为中心的医疗之家的特殊风味的关键。