Suppr超能文献

一项基于人群的关于美国女性生殖健康护理的偏好来源与常用来源的研究。

A population-based study of US women's preferred versus usual sources of reproductive health care.

作者信息

Hall Kelli Stidham, Patton Elizabeth W, Crissman Halley P, Zochowski Melissa K, Dalton Vanessa K

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):352.e1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We characterized US women's preferred and usual sources of reproductive health care.

STUDY DESIGN

Data were drawn from the Women's Health Care Experiences and Preferences Study, an Internet survey of 1078 women aged 18-55 years randomly sampled from a national probability panel. We described and compared women's preferred and usual sources of care (women's health specialists including obstetricians-gynecologists and family-planning clinics, primary care, other) for Papanicolaou/pelvic examination, contraception, and sexually transmitted infection (STI) services using χ(2), logistic regression, and kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Among women reporting health service utilization (n = 984, 92% overall; 77% Papanicolaou/pelvic; 33% contraception; 8% STI), women's health specialists were the most used sources of care for Papanicolaou/pelvic (68%), contraception (74%), and STI (75%) services. Women's health specialists were also the most preferred care sources for Papanicolaou/pelvic (68%), contraception (49%), and STI (35%) services, whereas the remainder of women preferred primary care/other sources or not to get care. Differences in preferred and usual care sources were noted across sociodemographic groups, including insurance status and income level (P < .05). Preference for women's health specialists was the strongest predictor of women's health specialist utilization for Papanicolaou/pelvic (adjusted odds ratio, 48.8; 95% confidence interval, 25.9-91.8; P < .001) and contraceptive (adjusted odds ratio, 194.5; 95% confidence interval, 42.3-894.6; P < .001) services. Agreement between preferred and usual-care sources was high for Papanicolaou/pelvic (85%, kappa, 0.63) and contraception (86%; kappa, 0.64) services; disagreement (range, 15-22%) was associated with insurance, employment, income, race, and religion (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Women's preferences for and use of women's health specialists for reproductive health care has implications for efforts to define the role of obstetricians-gynecologists and family planning clinics in current health systems.

摘要

目的

我们对美国女性首选的及通常的生殖健康护理来源进行了特征描述。

研究设计

数据取自女性医疗保健经历与偏好研究,这是一项通过互联网对1078名年龄在18至55岁的女性进行的调查,这些女性是从一个全国概率样本中随机抽取的。我们使用χ²检验、逻辑回归和kappa统计量,对女性在巴氏涂片检查/盆腔检查、避孕以及性传播感染(STI)服务方面首选的及通常的护理来源(包括妇产科医生和计划生育诊所等女性健康专家、初级保健、其他)进行了描述和比较。

结果

在报告有医疗服务利用情况的女性中(n = 984,总体占92%;巴氏涂片检查/盆腔检查占77%;避孕占33%;性传播感染占8%),女性健康专家是巴氏涂片检查/盆腔检查(68%)、避孕(74%)和性传播感染(75%)服务中使用最多的护理来源。女性健康专家也是巴氏涂片检查/盆腔检查(68%)、避孕(49%)和性传播感染(35%)服务方面最受青睐的护理来源,而其余女性则更倾向于初级保健/其他来源或不接受护理。在社会人口统计学群体中,包括保险状况和收入水平,首选和通常护理来源存在差异(P < 0.05)。对女性健康专家的偏好是女性在巴氏涂片检查/盆腔检查(调整后的优势比为48.8;95%置信区间为25.9 - 91.8;P < 0.001)和避孕(调整后的优势比为194.5;95%置信区间为42.3 - 894.6;P < 0.001)服务中选择女性健康专家的最强预测因素。巴氏涂片检查/盆腔检查(85%,kappa值为0.63)和避孕(86%;kappa值为0.64)服务的首选和通常护理来源之间的一致性较高;不一致情况(范围为15 - 22%)与保险、就业、收入、种族和宗教有关(P < 0.05)。

结论

女性在生殖健康护理方面对女性健康专家的偏好和使用情况,对界定妇产科医生和计划生育诊所在当前卫生系统中的作用具有启示意义。

相似文献

3
U.S. Women's Intended Sources for Reproductive Health Care.美国女性生殖健康护理的预期来源。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Jan;25(1):91-8. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5116. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
4
Women's Contraceptive Preference-Use Mismatch.女性避孕偏好与实际使用的不匹配。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Jun;26(6):692-701. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.5807. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
7
A comprehensive women's health care center: are gynecologists offering primary care?一家综合性女性医疗保健中心:妇科医生提供初级保健服务吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;194(6):1660-6; discussion 1666-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.03.010. Epub 2006 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Variation in state unintended pregnancy rates in the United States.美国各州意外妊娠率的差异。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012 Mar;44(1):57-64. doi: 10.1363/4405712. Epub 2012 Feb 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验