School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen Aberdeen, UK ; Department of Psychology, City University London London, UK.
Department of Psychological Sciences, Institute of Psychology, Health and Society, University of Liverpool Liverpool, UK.
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 18;4:948. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00948. eCollection 2013.
Until recently induced gamma-band activity (GBA) was considered a neural marker of cortical object representation. However, induced GBA in the electroencephalogram (EEG) is susceptible to artifacts caused by miniature fixational saccades. Recent studies have demonstrated that fixational saccades also reflect high-level representational processes. Do high-level as opposed to low-level factors influence fixational saccades? What is the effect of these factors on artifact-free GBA? To investigate this, we conducted separate eye tracking and EEG experiments using identical designs. Participants classified line drawings as objects or non-objects. To introduce low-level differences, contours were defined along different directions in cardinal color space: S-cone-isolating, intermediate isoluminant, or a full-color stimulus, the latter containing an additional achromatic component. Prior to the classification task, object discrimination thresholds were measured and stimuli were scaled to matching suprathreshold levels for each participant. In both experiments, behavioral performance was best for full-color stimuli and worst for S-cone isolating stimuli. Saccade rates 200-700 ms after stimulus onset were modulated independently by low and high-level factors, being higher for full-color stimuli than for S-cone isolating stimuli and higher for objects. Low-amplitude evoked GBA and total GBA were observed in very few conditions, showing that paradigms with isoluminant stimuli may not be ideal for eliciting such responses. We conclude that cortical loops involved in the processing of objects are preferentially excited by stimuli that contain achromatic information. Their activation can lead to relatively early exploratory eye movements even for foveally-presented stimuli.
直到最近,诱导的伽马波段活动(GBA)被认为是皮质物体表示的神经标记。然而,脑电图(EEG)中的诱导 GBA 容易受到微小型固视扫视引起的伪影的影响。最近的研究表明,固视扫视也反映了高级别表示过程。高级别因素而不是低级别因素会影响固视扫视吗?这些因素对无伪影 GBA 的影响是什么?为了研究这一点,我们使用相同的设计分别进行了眼动追踪和 EEG 实验。参与者将线条图分类为物体或非物体。为了引入低级差异,轮廓沿不同方向在主色空间中定义:S-锥体隔离、中间等亮度或全彩色刺激,后者包含额外的非彩色成分。在分类任务之前,测量了物体辨别阈值,并将刺激调整为匹配每个参与者的超阈值水平。在两项实验中,全彩色刺激的行为表现最好,S-锥体隔离刺激的行为表现最差。刺激后 200-700 毫秒的扫视率独立地受到低级和高级因素的调制,全彩色刺激的扫视率高于 S-锥体隔离刺激,物体的扫视率高于 S-锥体隔离刺激。在极少数情况下观察到低振幅诱发的 GBA 和总 GBA,这表明具有等亮度刺激的范式可能不适合引起这种反应。我们得出结论,涉及物体处理的皮质环路被包含非彩色信息的刺激优先激发。它们的激活甚至可以导致相对较早的探索性眼球运动,即使对于注视点呈现的刺激也是如此。