Institute of Psychology, University of Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e70293. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070293. Print 2013.
Visual object processing may follow a coarse-to-fine sequence imposed by fast processing of low spatial frequencies (LSF) and slow processing of high spatial frequencies (HSF). Objects can be categorized at varying levels of specificity: the superordinate (e.g. animal), the basic (e.g. dog), or the subordinate (e.g. Border Collie). We tested whether superordinate and more specific categorization depend on different spatial frequency ranges, and whether any such dependencies might be revealed by or influence signals recorded using EEG. We used event-related potentials (ERPs) and time-frequency (TF) analysis to examine the time course of object processing while participants performed either a grammatical gender-classification task (which generally forces basic-level categorization) or a living/non-living judgement (superordinate categorization) on everyday, real-life objects. Objects were filtered to contain only HSF or LSF. We found a greater positivity and greater negativity for HSF than for LSF pictures in the P1 and N1 respectively, but no effects of task on either component. A later, fronto-central negativity (N350) was more negative in the gender-classification task than the superordinate categorization task, which may indicate that this component relates to semantic or syntactic processing. We found no significant effects of task or spatial frequency on evoked or total gamma band responses. Our results demonstrate early differences in processing of HSF and LSF content that were not modulated by categorization task, with later responses reflecting such higher-level cognitive factors.
视觉对象处理可能遵循由快速处理低空间频率(LSF)和缓慢处理高空间频率(HSF)施加的粗到精的顺序。对象可以在不同的特异性水平进行分类:上级(例如动物),基本(例如狗)或下属(例如边境牧羊犬)。我们测试了上级和更具体的分类是否取决于不同的空间频率范围,以及任何此类依赖性是否可以通过 EEG 记录的信号揭示或影响。我们使用事件相关电位(ERPs)和时频(TF)分析来检查参与者在执行语法性别分类任务(通常强制进行基本分类)或对日常真实生活中的物体进行生命/非生命判断(上级分类)时对象处理的时间过程。物体经过过滤仅包含 HSF 或 LSF。我们发现 P1 中的 HSF 比 LSF 图片的正性更大,N1 中的负性更大,但任务对这两个成分都没有影响。稍后,在性别分类任务中,额中央负性(N350)比上级分类任务更负,这可能表明该成分与语义或句法处理有关。我们没有发现任务或空间频率对诱发或总伽马频带反应的显著影响。我们的结果表明,HSF 和 LSF 内容的处理存在早期差异,不受分类任务的调节,而后期反应则反映了这种更高层次的认知因素。