• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过根本原因分析对组织学中的错误进行分析:一项试点研究。

Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study.

作者信息

Morelli P, Porazzi E, Ruspini M, Restelli U, Banfi G

机构信息

Hospital of Novi Ligure, Italy.

Centre for Research on Health Economics, Social and Health Care Management (CREMS), Carlo Cattaneo University, LIUC, Castellanza, Italy.

出版信息

J Prev Med Hyg. 2013 Jun;54(2):90-6.

PMID:24396989
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4718384/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The study objective is to evaluate critical points in the process of pre-analytical histology in an Anatomic Pathology laboratory. Errors are an integral part of human systems, including the complex system of Anatomic Pathology. Previous studies focused on errors committed in diagnosis and did not consider the issues related to the histology preparation of routine processes.

METHODS

Root Cause Analysis was applied to the process of histology preparation in order to identify the root cause of each previously identified problem. The analysis started by defining an 'a priori' list of errors that could occur in the histology preparation processes. During a three-month period, a trained technician tracked the errors encountered during the process and reported them on a form. 'Fishbone' diagram and 'Five whys' methods were then applied

RESULTS

8,346 histological cases were reviewed, for which 19,774 samples were made and from which 29,956 histologies were prepared. 132 errors were identified. Errors were detected in each phase: accessioning (6.5%), gross dissecting (28%), processing (1.5%), embedding (4.5%), tissue cutting and slide mounting (23%), coloring, (1.5%), labeling and releasing (35%).

DISCUSSION

Root cause analysis is effective and easy to use in clinical risk management. It is an important step for the identification and prevention of errors, that are frequently due to multiple causes. Developing operators' awareness of their central role in the risk management process is possible by targeted training. Furthermore, by highlighting the most relevant points of interest, it is possible to improve both the methodology and the procedural safety.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是评估解剖病理学实验室分析前组织学过程中的关键点。错误是人类系统不可或缺的一部分,包括解剖病理学这个复杂系统。以往的研究主要关注诊断过程中出现的错误,而没有考虑常规流程中组织学制备相关的问题。

方法

对组织学制备过程应用根本原因分析,以确定每个先前识别问题的根本原因。分析从定义组织学制备过程中可能出现的错误的“先验”列表开始。在三个月的时间里,一名经过培训的技术人员跟踪该过程中遇到的错误,并在表格上进行报告。然后应用“鱼骨”图和“五个为什么”方法。

结果

共审查了8346例组织学病例,制作了19774个样本,制备了29956份组织切片。识别出132个错误。在每个阶段都检测到了错误:登记(6.5%)、大体解剖(28%)、处理(1.5%)、包埋(4.5%)、切片和贴片(23%)、染色(1.5%)、标记和发放(35%)。

讨论

根本原因分析在临床风险管理中有效且易于使用。它是识别和预防错误的重要步骤,错误通常由多种原因导致。通过有针对性的培训,可以提高操作人员对其在风险管理过程中核心作用的认识。此外,通过突出最相关的关注点,可以改进方法和程序安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/4718384/c187aae30b94/1121-2233-54-90-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/4718384/f0ecb77b4f44/1121-2233-54-90-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/4718384/05d83a6968de/1121-2233-54-90-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/4718384/c187aae30b94/1121-2233-54-90-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/4718384/f0ecb77b4f44/1121-2233-54-90-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/4718384/05d83a6968de/1121-2233-54-90-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/99ae/4718384/c187aae30b94/1121-2233-54-90-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of errors in histology by root cause analysis: a pilot study.通过根本原因分析对组织学中的错误进行分析:一项试点研究。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2013 Jun;54(2):90-6.
2
Root cause analysis of pre-microscopic errors in anatomical pathology using Eindhoven classification.利用埃因霍温分类法对解剖病理学中显微镜下前误差的根本原因分析。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;70(4):687-693. doi: 10.5455/JPMA.5565.
3
Nondiagnostic fine-needle aspirates of the pancreas: A root cause analysis.胰腺非诊断性细针抽吸:根本原因分析。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2020 Oct;128(10):704-714. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22301. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
4
Achieving High Reliability in Histology:  An Improvement Series to Reduce Errors.实现组织学的高可靠性:减少误差的改进系列
Am J Clin Pathol. 2016 Nov 1;146(5):554-560. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw148.
5
[Specimen misidentification in pathology laboratory: trends and measures].[病理学实验室中的标本误认:趋势与措施]
Rinsho Byori. 2013 Aug;61(8):751-9.
6
The problem with '5 whys'.“五个为什么”的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Aug;26(8):671-677. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005849. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
7
Use of a novel, modified fishbone diagram to analyze diagnostic errors.使用一种新颖的、改良的鱼骨图来分析诊断错误。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2014 Jun 1;1(2):167-171. doi: 10.1515/dx-2013-0040.
8
Clarifying radiology's role in safety events: a 5-year retrospective common cause analysis of safety events at a pediatric hospital.阐明放射科在安全事件中的作用:对一家儿童医院 5 年来安全事件的共同原因进行回顾性分析。
Pediatr Radiol. 2020 Sep;50(10):1409-1420. doi: 10.1007/s00247-020-04711-3. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
9
Improving patient safety by examining pathology errors.通过检查病理错误提高患者安全。
Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):849-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.05.014.
10
[Specimen labelling: A complex process with a high error rate].[标本标记:一个错误率高的复杂过程]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Sep;135-136:10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Mastering the art of sectioning: a comprehensive guide to slide-microtome technology and histological applications.掌握切片技术:切片机技术与组织学应用综合指南
Front Vet Sci. 2025 Aug 25;12:1635706. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1635706. eCollection 2025.
2
A Quality Improvement Intervention to Enhance Documentation on Histopathology Request Forms.一项旨在加强组织病理学申请表记录的质量改进干预措施。
Cureus. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):e81317. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81317. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Retinal Vascular and Structural Changes in the Murine Alzheimer's Model from 6 to 20 Months.

本文引用的文献

1
Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.病例、标本、组织块和切片的标签错误:美国病理学家学会对 136 家机构的研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Aug;135(8):969-74. doi: 10.5858/2010-0726-CPR.
2
Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.手术病理学标本标签错误:18 个月的经验。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Sep;134(3):466-70. doi: 10.1309/AJCPHLQHJ0S3DFJK.
3
Defining error in anatomic pathology.
从 6 个月到 20 个月的小鼠阿尔茨海默病模型中的视网膜血管和结构变化。
Biomolecules. 2024 Jul 10;14(7):828. doi: 10.3390/biom14070828.
4
WWFedCBMIR: World-Wide Federated Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval.全球联邦基于内容的医学图像检索
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;10(10):1144. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10101144.
5
HER2 classification in breast cancer cells: A new explainable machine learning application for immunohistochemistry.乳腺癌细胞中的HER2分类:一种用于免疫组织化学的新型可解释机器学习应用。
Oncol Lett. 2022 Dec 14;25(2):44. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13630. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Vibrational Biospectroscopy: An Alternative Approach to Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis and Screening.振动生物光谱学:子宫内膜癌诊断和筛查的另一种方法。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;23(9):4859. doi: 10.3390/ijms23094859.
7
Measuring the effect of a Western diet on liver tissue architecture by FLIM autofluorescence and harmonic generation microscopy.通过荧光寿命成像(FLIM)自发荧光和二次谐波产生显微镜测量西方饮食对肝组织结构的影响。
Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Jun 1;8(7):3143-3154. doi: 10.1364/BOE.8.003143. eCollection 2017 Jul 1.
8
Quality Measures in Pre-Analytical Phase of Tissue Processing: Understanding Its Value in Histopathology.组织处理分析前阶段的质量指标:了解其在组织病理学中的价值
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Jan;10(1):EC07-11. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/14546.7087. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
9
Histological Stains: A Literature Review and Case Study.组织学染色:文献综述与案例研究
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Jun 25;8(3):72-9. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n3p72.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2006 May;130(5):604-6. doi: 10.5858/2006-130-604-DEIAP.
4
Improving the quality of cytology diagnosis: root cause analysis for errors in bronchial washing and brushing specimens.提高细胞学诊断质量:支气管冲洗和刷检标本错误的根本原因分析
Am J Clin Pathol. 2005 Dec;124(6):883-92.
5
Anatomic pathology databases and patient safety.解剖病理学数据库与患者安全。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Oct;129(10):1246-51. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1246-APDAPS.
6
Error detection in anatomic pathology.解剖病理学中的错误检测
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Oct;129(10):1237-45. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1237-EDIAP.
7
Error and error reduction in pathology.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005 Oct;129(10):1228-33. doi: 10.5858/2005-129-1228-EAERIP.
8
Error in anatomic pathology.
Am J Clin Pathol. 2001 Dec;116 Suppl:S34-46. doi: 10.1309/DDKV-E4YP-CJ5Q-3M4V.
9
Errors in laboratory medicine.检验医学中的误差
Clin Chem. 2002 May;48(5):691-8.
10
Root cause analysis of laboratory delays to an emergency department.
J Emerg Med. 1997 Sep-Oct;15(5):735-9. doi: 10.1016/s0736-4679(97)00158-3.