• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术病理学标本标签错误:18 个月的经验。

Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Sep;134(3):466-70. doi: 10.1309/AJCPHLQHJ0S3DFJK.

DOI:10.1309/AJCPHLQHJ0S3DFJK
PMID:20716804
Abstract

Elimination of medical errors is important for pathologists. Errors occurring in surgical pathology involve specimen defects, specimen labeling, processing, diagnosis, and reporting defects. Errors occur during prelaboratory, laboratory, and postlaboratory phases. We reviewed our experience with mislabeled specimens in the laboratory for an 18-month period. The percentage of error was calculated on a per case, block, and slide basis. Errors were characterized by site and as incorrect patient or site. The study involved 75 labeling errors (0.25% of cases) that were detected. Of the 75 errors, 55 (73%) involved patient name, and 18 (24%) involved site. The majority of mislabelings (52 [69%]) occurred in the gross room. Although infrequent, labeling errors involved misidentification of patient or specimen source. Of the errors, 73% (55/75) of errors resulted in slides assigned to an incorrect patient. Most errors occurred in the gross room. Newer technologies such as bar coding and radio frequency chip methods may reduce the frequency of specimen labeling errors.

摘要

消除医疗差错对于病理学家来说很重要。手术病理中出现的差错涉及标本缺陷、标本标记、处理、诊断和报告缺陷。差错发生在实验前、实验中和实验后阶段。我们回顾了 18 个月来实验室中标记错误的标本的经验。按每例、每块和每张切片计算误差百分比。差错的特征是部位和患者或部位错误。这项研究涉及到 75 个(0.25%)被检测到的标记错误。在 75 个错误中,55 个(73%)涉及患者姓名,18 个(24%)涉及部位。大多数标记错误(52 个[69%])发生在大体标本室。尽管不常见,但标记错误涉及患者或标本来源的错误识别。在这些错误中,73%(55/75)的错误导致切片被分配给错误的患者。大多数错误发生在大体标本室。新的技术,如条形码和射频芯片方法,可能会减少标本标记错误的频率。

相似文献

1
Specimen labeling errors in surgical pathology: an 18-month experience.手术病理学标本标签错误:18 个月的经验。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2010 Sep;134(3):466-70. doi: 10.1309/AJCPHLQHJ0S3DFJK.
2
Surgical specimen identification errors: a new measure of quality in surgical care.手术标本识别错误:手术护理质量的一项新指标。
Surgery. 2007 Apr;141(4):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.08.018. Epub 2007 Jan 24.
3
A quality initiative to decrease pathology specimen-labeling errors using radiofrequency identification in a high-volume endoscopy center.在一家高流量内镜中心开展的一项质量改进举措,旨在利用射频识别技术减少病理标本标签错误。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Apr;104(4):972-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.170. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
4
Mislabeling of cases, specimens, blocks, and slides: a college of american pathologists study of 136 institutions.病例、标本、组织块和切片的标签错误:美国病理学家学会对 136 家机构的研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2011 Aug;135(8):969-74. doi: 10.5858/2010-0726-CPR.
5
Identification errors in pathology and laboratory medicine.病理学与检验医学中的识别错误。
Clin Lab Med. 2004 Dec;24(4):979-96, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cll.2004.05.013.
6
The role of 2D bar code and electronic cross-matching in the reduction of misidentification errors in a pathology laboratory. A safety system assisted by the use of information technology.二维条形码和电子交叉匹配在减少病理实验室识别错误中的作用。一种借助信息技术的安全系统。
Pathologica. 2011 Dec;103(6):313-7.
7
The Henry Ford Production System: reduction of surgical pathology in-process misidentification defects by bar code-specified work process standardization.亨利·福特生产系统:通过条形码指定的工作流程标准化减少手术病理过程中的错误识别缺陷。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Apr;131(4):468-77. doi: 10.1309/AJCPPTJ3XJY6ZXDB.
8
Radio-Frequency Identification Specimen Tracking to Improve Quality in Anatomic Pathology.射频识别标本追踪以提高解剖病理学质量。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020 Feb;144(2):189-195. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2019-0011-OA. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
9
Surgical pathology specimen identification and accessioning: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 1 004 115 cases from 417 institutions.外科病理标本的识别与登记:美国病理学家学会对来自417家机构的1004115例病例进行的Q-Probes研究。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1996 Mar;120(3):227-33.
10
[Specimen misidentification in pathology laboratory: trends and measures].[病理学实验室中的标本误认:趋势与措施]
Rinsho Byori. 2013 Aug;61(8):751-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing preanalytic surgical specimen management: experience of a system implementation initiative.加强术前手术标本管理:系统实施计划的经验
Diagn Pathol. 2025 Jul 31;20(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13000-025-01690-7.
2
Strategies to Overcome Erroneous Outcomes in Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) Testing: Insights From the COVID-19 Pandemic.克服逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测错误结果的策略:来自COVID-19大流行的见解
Cureus. 2024 Nov 3;16(11):e72954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72954. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
A Network Analysis of Multiple Myeloma Related Gene Signatures.
多发性骨髓瘤相关基因特征的网络分析
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Sep 27;11(10):1452. doi: 10.3390/cancers11101452.
4
Process Variation Detection using Missing Data in a Multihospital Community Practice Anatomic Pathology Laboratory.在多医院社区实践解剖病理实验室中利用缺失数据进行过程变异检测
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Aug 1;10:25. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_18_19. eCollection 2019.
5
Computational Algorithms that Effectively Reduce Report Defects in Surgical Pathology.有效减少外科病理学报告缺陷的计算算法
J Pathol Inform. 2019 Jul 1;10:20. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_17_19. eCollection 2019.
6
Surgical Specimen Handover from Operation Theater to Laboratory: A Survey.手术标本从手术室到实验室的交接:一项调查。
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Jul-Dec;8(2):234-238. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_51_18.
7
Evaluation of a patient safety programme on Surgical Safety Checklist Compliance: a prospective longitudinal study.一项关于手术安全核对表依从性的患者安全计划评估:一项前瞻性纵向研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jul 12;7(3):e000362. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000362. eCollection 2018.
8
Electronic p-Chip-Based System for Identification of Glass Slides and Tissue Cassettes in Histopathology Laboratories.用于组织病理学实验室中玻片和组织标本盒识别的基于电子p芯片的系统。
J Pathol Inform. 2018 Apr 2;9:9. doi: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_64_17. eCollection 2018.
9
How often are Patients Harmed When They Visit the Computed Tomography Suite? A Multi-year Experience, in Incident Reporting, in a Large Academic Medical Center.患者在前往计算机断层扫描室就诊时受伤的频率如何?一项在大型学术医疗中心进行的多年事件报告经验。
Eur Radiol. 2016 Jul;26(7):2064-72. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-4061-0. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
10
Quality improvement in basic histotechnology: the lean approach.基础组织技术学中的质量改进:精益方法。
Virchows Arch. 2016 Jan;468(1):5-17. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1838-0. Epub 2015 Aug 26.