• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无头加压螺钉切开复位内固定治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的临床及影像学评估

[Clinical and radiographic evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in treatment of lisfranc joint injuries].

作者信息

Zhang Hui, Min Li, Wang Guanglin, Liu Lei, Fang Yue, Tu Chongqi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan 610041, PR China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;27(10):1196-201.

PMID:24397130
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of headless compression screws for Lisfranc joint injuries.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was made on clinical data of 34 patients (36 feet) with Lisfranc joint injuries who underwent open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws between January 2006 and January 2012. There were 22 males (24 feet) and 12 females (12 feet), aged 21-73 years (mean, 38.9 years). The causes of injury included traffic accident in 16 cases (17 feet), falling from height in 11 cases (12 feet), crushing in 5 cases (5 feet), and sports in 2 cases (2 feet). Of them, there were 19 cases (20 feet) of closed injury and 15 cases (16 feet) of open injury; there were 7 cases (8 feet) of pure dislocations of tarsometatarsal joints and ligamentous Lisfranc injuries (LD), 22 cases (23 feet) of Lisfranc joint fracture dislocations (LFD), 5 cases (5 feet) of combined Chopart-LFD (CLFD). According to Myerson classification, 5 cases (5 feet) were rated as type A, 7 cases (8 feet) as type B1, 14 cases (15 feet) as type B2, 5 cases (5 feet) as type C1, and 3 cases (3 feet) as type C2. Associated fractures included 12 cases (13 feet) of metatarsal shaft fracture, 4 cases (4 feet) of cuboid fracture, 4 cases (4 feet) of navicular bone fracture, 6 cases (7 feet) of coneiform bone fracture/dislocation, 8 cases (10 feet) of ipsilateral lower limb multiple fracture, and 4 cases (4 feet) of contralateral lower limb multiple fracture. The clinical outcomes were evaluated according to American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Postoperative X-ray films were taken to assess the reduction, internal fixation, and the foot arch height.

RESULTS

All patients were followed up 1 year to 5 years and 2 months (mean, 3.5 years). X-ray films showed anatomical reduction in 31 cases (33 feet, 91.7%). At last follow-up, AOFAS score and VAS score averaged 80.6 (range, 60-100) and 2.3 (range, 0-6), respectively; the AOFAS score was significantly higher in patients having anatomical reduction than the patients having no anatomical reduction, in patients with LD and LFD than in patients with CLFD, and in patients without cuneiform bone fracture/dislocation than in patients with cuneiform bone fracture/dislocation (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the talus-first metatarsal angle, the distance between the lateral edge of the base of the first metatarsal bone and the medial edge of the base of the second metatarsal bone, and the arch height between the injured foot and normal foot (P > 0.05). Reduction loss was observed in 1 case (1 foot) because of early weight bearing; post-traumatic arthritis developed in 9 patients (10 feet). The incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis was higher in the patients with non-anatomic reduction, coneiform bone fracture/dislocation, comminuted intra-articular fractures of Lisfranc joints, the injury types (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Headless compression screws for fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries can provide satisfactory short- and mid-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. During surgery, the precise anatomic reduction and stable fixation should be paid attention to, especially in patients with CLFD, coneiform bone fracture/dislocation, and comminuted intra-articular fractures of Lisfranc joints so as to control the incidence of the post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

摘要

目的

评估无头加压螺钉治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的临床及影像学结果。

方法

回顾性分析2006年1月至2012年1月期间34例(36足)接受无头加压螺钉切开复位内固定治疗的Lisfranc关节损伤患者的临床资料。其中男性22例(24足),女性12例(12足),年龄21 - 73岁(平均38.9岁)。损伤原因包括交通事故16例(17足)、高处坠落11例(12足)、挤压伤5例(5足)、运动伤2例(2足)。其中闭合伤19例(20足),开放伤15例(16足);单纯跗跖关节脱位及Lisfranc韧带损伤(LD)7例(8足),Lisfranc关节骨折脱位(LFD)22例(23足),Chopart - LFD联合损伤(CLFD)5例(5足)。根据Myerson分型,A型5例(5足),B1型7例(8足),B2型14例(15足),C1型5例(5足),C2型3例(3足)。合并骨折包括跖骨干骨折12例(13足)、骰骨骨折4例(4足)、舟骨骨折4例(4足)、楔骨骨折/脱位6例(7足)、同侧下肢多发骨折8例(10足)、对侧下肢多发骨折4例(4足)。根据美国矫形足踝协会(AOFAS)评分及视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估临床疗效。术后拍摄X线片评估复位、内固定及足弓高度情况。

结果

所有患者随访1年至5年2个月(平均3.5年)。X线片显示31例(33足,91.7%)解剖复位。末次随访时,AOFAS评分平均为80.6(范围60 - 100),VAS评分平均为2.3(范围0 - 6);解剖复位患者的AOFAS评分显著高于未解剖复位患者,LD和LFD患者高于CLFD患者,无楔骨骨折/脱位患者高于有楔骨骨折/脱位患者(P < 0.05)。患足与正常足的距骨 - 第一跖骨角、第一跖骨基底外侧缘与第二跖骨基底内侧缘之间的距离及足弓高度比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。1例(1足)因早期负重出现复位丢失;9例(10足)发生创伤性关节炎。非解剖复位、楔骨骨折/脱位、Lisfranc关节粉碎性关节内骨折患者的创伤性骨关节炎发生率较高(P < 0.05)。

结论

无头加压螺钉固定Lisfranc关节损伤可提供满意的中短期临床及影像学结果。手术中应注意精确的解剖复位及稳定固定,尤其是CLFD、楔骨骨折/脱位及Lisfranc关节粉碎性关节内骨折患者,以控制创伤性骨关节炎的发生率。

相似文献

1
[Clinical and radiographic evaluation of open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in treatment of lisfranc joint injuries].无头加压螺钉切开复位内固定治疗Lisfranc关节损伤的临床及影像学评估
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;27(10):1196-201.
2
Primary open reduction and internal fixation with headless compression screws in the treatment of Chinese patients with acute Lisfranc joint injuries.无头加压空心螺钉内固定治疗中国急性跖跗关节损伤。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 May;72(5):1380-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318246eabc.
3
[Treatment of fresh closed fracture-dislocation of midtarsal joint].[新鲜闭合性跗中关节骨折脱位的治疗]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;26(10):1178-81.
4
Combined medial column primary arthrodesis, middle column open reduction internal fixation, and lateral column pinning for treatment of Lisfranc fracture-dislocation injuries.联合内侧柱一期关节融合术、中柱切开复位内固定术及外侧柱克氏针固定术治疗Lisfranc骨折脱位损伤。
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2014 Sep-Oct;53(5):657-63. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2014.04.016. Epub 2014 May 17.
5
The effect of the Tscherne injury pattern on the outcome of operatively treated Lisfranc fracture dislocations.Tscherne 损伤分型对手术治疗的跖跗关节骨折脱位预后的影响。
Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep;19(3):188-93. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 May 11.
6
Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries.Lisfranc关节损伤切开复位内固定术后的结果
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Nov;82(11):1609-18. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200011000-00015.
7
Temporary Internal Fixation for Ligamentous and Osseous Lisfranc Injuries: Outcome and Technical Tip.跖跗关节韧带和骨性损伤的临时内固定:结果与技术要点
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Aug;36(8):976-83. doi: 10.1177/1071100715577787. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
8
[Effective analysis of open reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of acute Lisfranc joint injury].切开复位内固定治疗急性Lisfranc关节损伤的疗效分析
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Nov;24(11):922-5.
9
[Treatment of occult Lisfranc injury with open reduction and internal fixation].切开复位内固定治疗隐匿性Lisfranc损伤
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jul;25(7):785-8.
10
Primary open reduction and fixation compared with delayed corrective arthrodesis in the treatment of tarsometatarsal (Lisfranc) fracture dislocation.在跗跖关节(Lisfranc)骨折脱位治疗中,一期切开复位内固定与延迟矫正关节融合术的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 Nov;90(11):1499-506. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20695.

引用本文的文献

1
Internal Brace Fixation Technique for Lisfranc Injury: A Retrospective Study.跖跗关节损伤的内固定修复技术:一项回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jul 2;30:e943537. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943537.