Abbasian Mohammad Reza, Paradies Felix, Weber Martin, Krause Fabian
Inselspital, Orthopaedic Surgery, Berne, Switzerland.
Zieglerspital, Orthopaedic surgery, Bern, Switzerland.
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Aug;36(8):976-83. doi: 10.1177/1071100715577787. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
Open rather than closed reduction and internal fixation as well as primary definitive arthrodesis are well accepted for ligamentous and osseous Lisfranc injuries. For ligamentous injuries, a better outcome after primary definitive partial arthrodesis has been published.
Of 135 Lisfranc injuries that were treated from 1998 to 2012 with open reduction, temporary internal fixation by screws and plates, and restricted weight bearing in a lower leg cast for 3 months followed by an arch support for another 4 to 6 weeks, 29 ligamentous Lisfranc injuries were available for follow-up. They were compared with 29 osseous Lisfranc injuries matched in age and gender.
Between the groups, there were no significant differences in average age (39.9 vs 38 years) or in average follow-up time (8.3 vs 9.1 years). Also, no significant differences were seen in the AOFAS midfoot score (84 vs 85.3 points), the FFI pain scale (9.9 vs 14.9 points), SF 36 physical component (56.2 vs 53.9 points), SF 36 mental component (57 vs 56.4 points), or VAS for pain (1.6 vs 1.5 points). The FFI function scale was significantly lower in the ligamentous group (11.6 vs 19.5 points). Radiographically, loss of reduction was recorded 3 times in the ligamentous injuries and 4 times in the osseous injuries. Arthritis was mild/moderate/severe in 5/3/0 ligamentous injuries and in 7/2/1 osseous injuries, requiring 1 definitive secondary Lisfranc arthrodesis in each group.
With longer and conservative postoperative management, open reduction and temporary internal fixation in ligamentous and osseous Lisfranc injuries led to equal medium-term outcome. Inferior outcome in ligamentous injuries was not found.
Level III, retrospective comparative cohort study.
对于韧带性和骨性Lisfranc损伤,开放性复位而非闭合性复位及内固定以及一期确定性关节融合术已被广泛接受。对于韧带性损伤,一期确定性部分关节融合术后有更好的疗效报道。
1998年至2012年期间,135例Lisfranc损伤采用切开复位、螺钉和钢板临时内固定,并在小腿石膏中限制负重3个月,随后再使用足弓支撑4至6周进行治疗,其中29例韧带性Lisfranc损伤可供随访。将它们与29例年龄和性别匹配的骨性Lisfranc损伤进行比较。
两组之间,平均年龄(39.9岁对38岁)或平均随访时间(8.3年对9.1年)无显著差异。此外,美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)中足评分(84分对85.3分)、足功能指数(FFI)疼痛量表(9.9分对14.9分)、SF-36身体成分评分(56.2分对53.9分)、SF-36精神成分评分(57分对56.4分)或视觉模拟评分法(VAS)疼痛评分(1.6分对1.5分)均无显著差异。韧带性损伤组的FFI功能量表得分显著更低(11.6分对19.5分)。影像学检查显示,韧带性损伤中有3次出现复位丢失,骨性损伤中有4次出现复位丢失。韧带性损伤中5/3/0例出现轻度/中度/重度关节炎,骨性损伤中7/2/1例出现轻度/中度/重度关节炎,每组均需要1次确定性二期Lisfranc关节融合术。
通过更长时间的保守术后管理,韧带性和骨性Lisfranc损伤的切开复位和临时内固定导致了相等的中期疗效。未发现韧带性损伤的疗效较差。
III级,回顾性比较队列研究。