Cindolo Luca, Berardinelli Francesco, Fanizza Caterina, Romero Marilena, Pirozzi Luisella, Tamburro Fabiola Raffaella, Pellegrini Fabrizio, Neri Fabio, Pitrelli Andrea, Schips Luigi
S. Pio da Pietrelcina Hospital, Dept. of Urology, Vasto.
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Dec 31;85(4):200-6. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.4.200.
To investigate differences in the risk of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH)- related hospitalization, for surgical and non-surgical reasons, and of new prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis between patients under dutasteride or finasteride treatment.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from record-linkage of administrative databases. Men aged ≥ 40 years old who had received a prescription for at least 10 boxes/year (index years: 2004-06) were included. The association of the outcomes was assessed using a multiple Cox proportional hazard model. Propensity score matched analysis and a 5-to-1, greedy 1:1 matching algorithm were performed. The budget impact analysis of dutasteride vs finasteride in BPH-treated patient was performed.
From an initial cohort of about 1.5 million of Italian men, 19620 were selected. The overall hospitalization for BPH-non surgical reasons, for BPH-related surgery and for new detection of PCa incidence rates (IRs) were 8.20 (95% CI, 7.62-8.23), 18.0 (95% CI, 17.12-18.93) and 8.62 (95% CI, 8.03-9.26) per 1000 person-years, respectively. The multivariate analysis after the propensity score-matching showed that dutasteride was associated with an independent reduced likelihood of hospitalization for BPH-related surgery (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.73-0.93; p = 0.0025) and of newly detected PCa (HR: 0.76,95% CI, 0.65-0.85; p = 0.0116). The IR for BPH-non surgical reasons was 8.07 (95% CI, 7.10-9.17) and 9.25 (95% CI, 8.19-10.44) per 1000 person-years, respectively. The IR for BPH-related surgery was 18.28 (95% CI, 17.17-20.32) and 21.28 (95% CI, 19.24-23.06) per 1000 person-years among patients under dutasteride compared with those under finasteride, respectively. For new-onset PCa, the IR was 8.01 (95% CI, 7.07-9.08) and 9.38 (95% CI, 8.32-10.58) per 1000 person-years The pharmacoeconomical evaluation showed that the net budget impact of the use of dutasteride vs. finasteride in 1000 BPH-treated patient for 1 year induces a saving of 3933 €.
The clinical effects of dutasteride and finasteride are slightly different. The likelihood of hospitalization for BPH-related surgery and of newly detected PCa seems to be in favor of dutasteride. The budget impact analyses showed a slightly benefit for dutasteride. Comparative prospective studies are necessary to confirm these results.
研究接受度他雄胺或非那雄胺治疗的患者因良性前列腺增生(BPH)相关原因住院(手术和非手术原因)以及新发前列腺癌(PCa)诊断风险的差异。
利用行政数据库记录链接的数据进行回顾性队列研究。纳入年龄≥40岁且每年至少开具10盒处方(索引年份:2004 - 2006年)的男性。使用多重Cox比例风险模型评估结局的关联。进行倾向评分匹配分析和5比1的贪婪1比1匹配算法。对BPH治疗患者中使用度他雄胺与非那雄胺进行预算影响分析。
从约150万意大利男性的初始队列中,选取了19620人。BPH非手术原因、BPH相关手术以及新发PCa的总体住院发病率(IR)分别为每1000人年8.20(95%CI,7.62 - 8.23)、18.0(95%CI,17.12 - 18.93)和8.62(95%CI,8.03 - 9.26)。倾向评分匹配后的多变量分析显示,度他雄胺与BPH相关手术住院(HR 0.82;95%CI 0.73 - 0.93;p = 0.0025)以及新发PCa(HR:0.76,95%CI,0.65 - 0.85;p = 0.0116)的独立降低可能性相关。BPH非手术原因的IR分别为每1000人年8.07(95%CI,7.10 - 9.17)和9.25(95%CI,8.19 - 10.44)。与非那雄胺治疗的患者相比,度他雄胺治疗的患者中BPH相关手术的IR分别为每1000人年18.28(95%CI,17.17 - 20.32)和21.28(95%CI,19.24 - 23.06)。对于新发PCa,IR分别为每1000人年8.01(95%CI,7.07 - 9.08)和9.38(95%CI,8.32 - 10.58)。药物经济学评估显示,在1000例BPH治疗患者中使用度他雄胺与非那雄胺1年的净预算影响可节省3933欧元。
度他雄胺和非那雄胺的临床效果略有不同。BPH相关手术住院和新发PCa的可能性似乎更有利于度他雄胺。预算影响分析显示度他雄胺略有优势。需要进行比较性前瞻性研究来证实这些结果。