Suppr超能文献

中风患者中单次经颅磁刺激(rTMS)的系列治疗:反应者与无反应者的特征

Serial treatments of primed low-frequency rTMS in stroke: characteristics of responders vs. nonresponders.

作者信息

Carey James R, Deng Huiqiong, Gillick Bernadette T, Cassidy Jessica M, Anderson David C, Zhang Lei, Thomas William

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(2):323-35. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130358.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study analyzed the characteristics of responders vs. nonresponders in people with stroke receiving a novel form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to improve hand function.

METHODS

Twelve people with stroke received five treatments of 6-Hz primed low-frequency rTMS to the contralesional primary motor area. We compared demographic factors, clinical features, and the ipsilesional/contralesional volume ratio of selected brain regions in those who improved hand performance (N = 7) on the single-hand component of the Test Évaluant la performance des Membres supérieurs des Personnes Âgées (TEMPA) and those who showed no improvement (N = 5).

RESULTS

Responders showed significantly greater baseline paretic hand function on the TEMPA, greater preservation volume of the ipsilesional posterior limb of the internal capsule (PLIC), and lower scores (i.e., less depression) on the Beck Depression Inventory than nonresponders. There were no differences in age, sex, stroke duration, paretic side, stroke hemisphere, baseline resting motor threshold for ipsilesional primary motor area (M1), NIH Stroke Scale, Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer, Mini-Mental State Examination, or preservation volume of M1, primary somatosensory area, premotor cortex, or supplementary motor area.

CONCLUSION

Our results support that preserved PLIC volume is an important influential factor affecting responsiveness to rTMS.

摘要

目的

本研究分析了接受新型重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)以改善手部功能的中风患者中反应者与无反应者的特征。

方法

12名中风患者接受了对患侧初级运动区进行5次6赫兹预适应低频rTMS治疗。我们比较了在老年上肢功能评估测试(TEMPA)单手部分手部功能得到改善的患者(N = 7)和未改善的患者(N = 5)的人口统计学因素、临床特征以及所选脑区的同侧/对侧体积比。

结果

与无反应者相比,反应者在TEMPA上的基线患侧手部功能明显更好,同侧内囊后肢(PLIC)的保留体积更大,并且在贝克抑郁量表上的得分更低(即抑郁程度更低)。在年龄、性别、中风持续时间、患侧、中风半球、同侧初级运动区(M1)的基线静息运动阈值、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表、上肢Fugl - Meyer评分、简易精神状态检查,或M1、初级体感区、运动前皮层或辅助运动区的保留体积方面没有差异。

结论

我们的结果支持PLIC保留体积是影响对rTMS反应性的重要影响因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c79/5560130/5c6bc10d3be4/nihms885819f1.jpg

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验