Call Jason A, Prendergast Brendan M, Jensen Lindsay G, Ord Celine B, Goodman Karyn A, Jacob Rojymon, Mell Loren K, Thomas Charles R, Jabbour Salma K, Miller Robert C
*Cancer Care Northwest, Spokane, WA #Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN †Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL ‡Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA §Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR ∥Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY ¶Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2016 Feb;39(1):8-12. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000009.
To assess toxicity and efficacy of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for anal cancer.
Records of 152 patients were reviewed retrospectively from multiple institutions. Data on disease control and toxicity were collected as well as patient and treatment characteristics. Acute (<6 mo) and late (≥6 mo) severe toxicity (grade ≥3) were graded. Four patients were excluded due to the presence of metastatic disease or stage TX. Late toxicity data were available for 120 patients.
Median cumulative IMRT dose was 51.25 Gy (median, 28 fractions). All but 2 patients received chemotherapy. With median follow-up of 26.8 months, local control at 3 years was 87%, worse for patients with T3-T4 than T1-T2 disease on univariate analysis (79% vs. 90%; P=0.04). Regional control, distant control, and overall survival were 97%, 91%, and 87%, respectively, at 3 years. Nodal status was associated with regional control, distant control, and overall survival (P<0.01 for each). Most common severe acute toxicity was hematologic (41%), skin (20%), and gastrointestinal tract (11%). Two grade 5 toxicities occurred (hematologic and gastrointestinal tract). Severe late toxicity affected skin (1%) and gastrointestinal tract (3%).
IMRT with chemotherapy resulted in excellent local control. Although T stage predicted worse local control, most T3-T4 disease was controlled with IMRT. Nodal status predicted regional and distant control and overall survival. Severe toxicity was acceptable.
评估调强放射治疗(IMRT)用于肛管癌的毒性和疗效。
回顾性分析来自多个机构的152例患者的记录。收集疾病控制和毒性数据以及患者和治疗特征。对急性(<6个月)和晚期(≥6个月)严重毒性(≥3级)进行分级。4例患者因存在转移性疾病或TX期而被排除。120例患者有晚期毒性数据。
IMRT累积剂量中位数为51.25 Gy(中位数,28次分割)。除2例患者外,所有患者均接受了化疗。中位随访26.8个月,3年局部控制率为87%,单因素分析显示T3 - T4期患者的局部控制率低于T1 - T2期患者(79%对90%;P = 0.04)。3年区域控制率、远处控制率和总生存率分别为97%、91%和87%。淋巴结状态与区域控制、远处控制和总生存率相关(每项P<0.01)。最常见的严重急性毒性为血液学毒性(41%)、皮肤毒性(20%)和胃肠道毒性(11%)。发生了2例5级毒性(血液学和胃肠道)。严重晚期毒性影响皮肤(1%)和胃肠道(3%)。
IMRT联合化疗可实现良好的局部控制。虽然T分期预示局部控制较差,但大多数T3 - T4期疾病通过IMRT得到了控制。淋巴结状态预示区域和远处控制以及总生存率。严重毒性是可接受的。