Suppr超能文献

全软缝线锚与改良 Broström-Gould 缝线修复治疗外侧副韧带重建的生物力学比较。

Biomechanical comparison of an all-soft suture anchor with a modified Broström-Gould suture repair for lateral ligament reconstruction.

机构信息

Kenneth J. Hunt, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford University, 450 Broadway Street, Pavilion C, MC 6342, Redwood City, CA 94063, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;42(2):417-22. doi: 10.1177/0363546513517873. Epub 2014 Jan 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anatomic repair is indicated for patients who have recurrent lateral ankle instability despite nonoperative measures.

HYPOTHESIS

There is no difference in repair stiffness, failure torque, or failure angle between specimens repaired with all-soft suture anchors versus the modified Broström-Gould technique with sutures only.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

In 10 matched pairs of human cadaveric ankles, the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) was incised from its origin on the fibula. After randomization, 1 ankle was repaired to its anatomic insertion using two 1.4-mm JuggerKnot all-soft suture anchors; the other ankle was repaired with a modified Broström-Gould technique using 2-0 FiberWire. All were augmented using the inferior extensor retinaculum. All ankles were mounted to the testing machine in 20° of plantar flexion and 15° of internal rotation and loaded to failure after the repair. Stiffness, failure torque, and failure angle were recorded and compared using a paired Student t test with a significance level set at P < .05.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in failure torque, failure angle, or stiffness. No anchors pulled out of bone. The primary mode of failure was pulling through the ATFL tissue.

CONCLUSION

There was no statistical difference in strength or stiffness between a 1.4-mm all-soft suture anchor and a modified Broström-Gould repair with 2-0 FiberWire. The primary mode of failure was at the tissue level rather than knot failure or anchor pullout.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The particular implant choice (suture only, tunnel, anchor) in repairing the lateral ligament complex may not be as important as the time to biological healing. The suture-only construct as described in the Broström-Gould repair was as strong as all-soft suture anchors, and the majority of the ankles failed at the tissue level. For those surgeons whose preference is to use anchor repair, this novel all-soft suture anchor may be an alternative to other larger anchors, as none failed by pullout.

摘要

背景

对于那些尽管经过非手术治疗仍反复发生外侧踝关节不稳定的患者,解剖修复是指征。

假设

用全软缝线锚钉修复与仅用缝线的改良 Broström-Gould 技术修复的标本之间,在修复后的刚度、失效扭矩或失效角度方面没有差异。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

在 10 对匹配的人尸体踝关节中,从前腓骨切迹切开距腓前韧带(ATFL)。随机化后,1 个踝关节使用 2 个 1.4mm 的 JuggerKnot 全软缝线锚钉修复至其解剖插入点;另 1 个踝关节使用 2-0 FiberWire 的改良 Broström-Gould 技术修复。所有标本均使用下伸肌支持带加强。所有踝关节均在 20°跖屈和 15°内旋下安装在试验机上,并在修复后加载至失效。使用配对学生 t 检验记录并比较刚度、失效扭矩和失效角度,置信水平设为 P <.05。

结果

失效扭矩、失效角度或刚度没有显著差异。没有锚钉从骨中拔出。主要的失效模式是通过 ATFL 组织拉出。

结论

在 1.4mm 全软缝线锚钉与用 2-0 FiberWire 的改良 Broström-Gould 修复之间,在强度或刚度方面没有统计学差异。主要的失效模式是在组织水平,而不是在结失败或锚钉拔出。

临床相关性

修复外侧韧带复合体的特定植入物选择(仅缝线、隧道、锚钉)可能不如生物愈合时间重要。Broström-Gould 修复中描述的仅缝线结构与全软缝线锚钉一样牢固,大多数踝关节在组织水平失效。对于那些更喜欢使用锚钉修复的外科医生来说,这种新型全软缝线锚钉可能是其他较大锚钉的替代物,因为没有锚钉因拔出而失效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验