Suppr超能文献

经颅多普勒检测时,肱静脉与股静脉注射振荡生理盐水对检测右向左分流的敏感性比较。

Sensitivity of brachial versus femoral vein injection of agitated saline to detect right-to-left shunts with Transcranial Doppler.

作者信息

Gevorgyan Rubine, Perlowski Alice, Shenoda Michael, Mojadidi M Khalid, Agrawal Harsh, Tobis Jonathan M

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Department of Medicine, Cardiology, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Nov 15;84(6):992-6. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25391. Epub 2014 Jul 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcranial Doppler (TCD) can detect a right-to-left shunt (RLS) with high sensitivity but has a 5% chance of a false negative study. TCD is usually performed with injection of agitated saline into an arm vein. We compared the sensitivity of TCD performed from the brachial versus femoral veins.

METHODS

Patients presenting to the cardiac catheterization laboratory for percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) were enrolled. Power M-mode Transcranial Doppler (Terumo 150 PMD) was conducted. After injection of a mixture of 8 cc of agitated saline, 0.5 cc of air, and 1 cc of blood into the brachial vein, embolic tracks were counted over the middle cerebral arteries. The degree of RLS was evaluated by TCD at rest, and with Valsalva at 40 mmHg aided by visual feedback with a manometer device. The test was repeated using femoral venous injections.

RESULTS

Sixty five patients were enrolled, mean age 52, 43% male. TCD grades were significantly higher with femoral injections compared to brachial injections at rest (p<0.0001), and with the Valsalva maneuver (p<0.0001). The presence of a RLS was confirmed by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) during cardiac catheterization in 62 (95.4%) patients.

CONCLUSION

The sensitivity of TCD for detection of RLS is increased when agitated saline injections are performed through the femoral vein. In patients with a high clinical suspicion for RLS, low TCD grades obtained with traditional brachial venous access should be interpreted with caution. When possible, a repeat study using femoral venous access may be considered.

摘要

背景

经颅多普勒(TCD)能够高灵敏度地检测到右向左分流(RLS),但有5%的假阴性检查概率。TCD通常通过向手臂静脉注射搅动生理盐水来进行。我们比较了经肱静脉与股静脉进行TCD检查的灵敏度。

方法

纳入到心脏导管实验室行卵圆孔未闭(PFO)经皮封堵术的患者。采用功率M型经颅多普勒(Terumo 150 PMD)进行检查。向肱静脉注射8 cc搅动生理盐水、0.5 cc空气和1 cc血液的混合液后,对大脑中动脉的栓子移动轨迹进行计数。通过TCD在静息状态下以及借助压力计装置视觉反馈在40 mmHg做Valsalva动作时评估RLS的程度。使用股静脉注射重复该检查。

结果

纳入65例患者,平均年龄52岁,43%为男性。与经肱静脉注射相比,静息时(p<0.0001)以及做Valsalva动作时(p<0.0001),经股静脉注射的TCD分级显著更高。在心脏导管检查期间,62例(95.4%)患者经心内超声心动图(ICE)证实存在RLS。

结论

经股静脉注射搅动生理盐水时,TCD检测RLS的灵敏度会提高。对于临床高度怀疑存在RLS的患者,传统经肱静脉通路获得的低TCD分级结果应谨慎解读。如有可能,可考虑使用股静脉通路重复检查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验