Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Apr;3(4):343-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.12.012.
The purpose of this study was to understand the reason for variation in the sensitivity of different methods of detecting right-to-left shunts (RLS).
Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is implicated in the pathogenesis of cryptogenic stroke, decompression illness, and migraine headaches. Intravenous agitated saline injections with tomographic imaging (transthoracic, transesophageal, and intracardiac echocardiography) has been used for detecting intracardiac shunts. Some patients with a high clinical suspicion of PFO have inconclusive echocardiographic study results. Transcranial Doppler (TCD) is an alternative method for detecting RLS that is not dependent on tomographic imaging.
Thirty-eight consecutive patients who were undergoing PFO closure had simultaneous transcranial Doppler and intracardiac echocardiography performed. Agitated saline injections were performed at rest, with Valsalva maneuver, and with forced expiration into a manometer to 40 mm Hg before and after closure, as well as 3 or more months after closure. Right atrial pressures were measured in the periprocedural period, and RLS were graded according to standard methods during these maneuvers.
Right atrial pressures were significantly higher with Valsalva maneuver compared with rest (before closure 21.6 +/- 11.9 mm Hg vs. 6.6 +/- 2.6 mm Hg, p < 0.001; after closure 28.4 +/- 13.9 mm Hg vs. 6.8 +/- 2.6 mm Hg, p < 0.001) and with manometer compared with Valsalva maneuver (before closure 38.7 +/- 6.6 mm Hg vs. 21.6 +/- 11.9 mm Hg, p < 0.001; after closure 44.0 +/- 9.5 mm Hg vs. 28.4 +/- 13.9 mm Hg, p < 0.001). Intracardiac echocardiography underestimated shunting in 34% of patients with Valsalva maneuver or manometer after closure compared with TCD.
Transcranial Doppler with immediate feedback provided by forced expiration against a manometer to 40 mm Hg is more sensitive than echocardiographic imaging for the detection of RLS. These observations have significant implications for determining the incidence of RLS in patients with stroke or migraine.
本研究旨在了解不同方法检测右向左分流(RLS)敏感性差异的原因。
卵圆孔未闭(PFO)与隐源性卒中、减压病和偏头痛的发病机制有关。静脉注射搅动盐水并进行断层成像(经胸、经食管和心内超声心动图)已用于检测心内分流。一些高度怀疑 PFO 的患者超声心动图检查结果不确定。经颅多普勒(TCD)是一种替代检测 RLS 的方法,它不依赖于断层成像。
对 38 例接受 PFO 封堵术的患者同时进行 TCD 和心内超声心动图检查。在封堵前和封堵后休息时、行瓦氏动作时、用血压计用力呼气至 40mmHg 时,以及封堵后 3 个月以上时,进行搅动盐水注射。在围手术期测量右心房压力,并在这些操作过程中根据标准方法对 RLS 进行分级。
与休息时相比,瓦氏动作时右心房压力明显升高(封堵前 21.6±11.9mmHg 比 6.6±2.6mmHg,p<0.001;封堵后 28.4±13.9mmHg 比 6.8±2.6mmHg,p<0.001),用血压计时比瓦氏动作时更高(封堵前 38.7±6.6mmHg 比 21.6±11.9mmHg,p<0.001;封堵后 44.0±9.5mmHg 比 28.4±13.9mmHg,p<0.001)。与 TCD 相比,封堵后瓦氏动作或血压计时心内超声心动图低估分流的患者占 34%。
用血压计以 40mmHg 强制呼气的 TCD 具有即时反馈,比超声心动图成像更敏感,用于检测 RLS。这些观察结果对确定卒中或偏头痛患者 RLS 的发生率具有重要意义。