Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, , Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk, Antwerpen, Belgium, Department of Biomolecular and Sport Sciences, Coventry University, , Coventry, UK, Division of Biology, University of Zagreb, , Zagreb, Croatia, Applied Biodiversity Research Division, South African National Biodiversity Institute, , Cape Town, South Africa, Department of Botany and Zoology, University of Stellenbosch, , Matieland, South Africa, Department of Zoology, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, , Port Elizabeth, South Africa, UMR7179, CNRS/MNHN, , Paris, France, Department of Biology, University of Ghent, , Ghent, Belgium.
Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Jan 8;281(1777):20132677. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2677. Print 2014 Feb 22.
Trade-offs arise when two functional traits impose conflicting demands on the same design trait. Consequently, excellence in one comes at the cost of performance in the other. One of the most widely studied performance trade-offs is the one between sprint speed and endurance. Although biochemical, physiological and (bio)mechanical correlates of either locomotor trait conflict with each other, results at the whole-organism level are mixed. Here, we test whether burst (speed, acceleration) and sustained locomotion (stamina) trade off at both the isolated muscle and whole-organism level among 17 species of lacertid lizards. In addition, we test for a mechanical link between the organismal and muscular (power output, fatigue resistance) performance traits. We find weak evidence for a trade-off between burst and sustained locomotion at the whole-organism level; however, there is a significant trade-off between muscle power output and fatigue resistance in the isolated muscle level. Variation in whole-animal sprint speed can be convincingly explained by variation in muscular power output. The variation in locomotor stamina at the whole-organism level does not relate to the variation in muscle fatigue resistance, suggesting that whole-organism stamina depends not only on muscle contractile performance but probably also on the performance of the circulatory and respiratory systems.
当两个功能特征对同一设计特征施加冲突的要求时,就会出现权衡。因此,一个方面的卓越表现是以另一个方面的表现为代价的。研究最多的性能权衡之一是冲刺速度和耐力之间的权衡。尽管生化、生理和(生物)力学的运动特征相关性相互冲突,但在整个生物体水平上的结果是混杂的。在这里,我们测试在 17 种蜥蜴物种中,在分离的肌肉和整个生物体水平上,爆发(速度、加速度)和持续运动(耐力)是否存在权衡。此外,我们还测试了生物体和肌肉(功率输出、抗疲劳能力)性能特征之间的机械联系。我们在整个生物体水平上发现了爆发和持续运动之间存在微弱的权衡;然而,在分离的肌肉水平上,肌肉功率输出和抗疲劳能力之间存在显著的权衡。整个动物的冲刺速度的变化可以用肌肉功率输出的变化来解释。在整个生物体水平上的运动耐力的变化与肌肉疲劳阻力的变化无关,这表明整个生物体的耐力不仅取决于肌肉收缩性能,而且可能还取决于循环和呼吸系统的性能。