Antolinos-Campillo P J, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Heredia-Rizo A M, Espí-López G V, Ricard F
Madrid Osteopathic School, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.
Physiotherapy. 2014 Sep;100(3):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
To assess the immediate effect of a suboccipital muscle inhibition (SMI) technique on: (a) neck pain, (b) elbow extension range of motion during the upper limb neurodynamic test of the median nerve (ULNT-1), and (c) grip strength in subjects with cervical whiplash; and determine the relationships between key variables.
Randomised, single-blind, controlled clinical trial.
Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Spain.
Forty subjects {mean age 34 years [standard deviation (SD) 3.6]} with Grade I or II cervical whiplash and a positive response to the ULNT-1 were recruited and distributed into two study groups: intervention group (IG) (n=20) and control group (CG) (n=20).
The IG underwent the SMI technique for 4minutes and the CG received a sham (placebo) intervention. Measures were collected immediately after the intervention.
The primary outcome was elbow range of motion during the ULNT-1, measured with a goniometer. The secondary outcomes were self-perceived neck pain (visual analogue scale) and free-pain grip strength, measured with a digital dynamometer.
The mean baseline elbow range of motion was 116.0° (SD 10.2) for the CG and 130.1° (SD 7.8) for the IG. The within-group comparison found a significant difference in elbow range of motion for the IG [mean difference -15.4°, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.1 to -10.6; P=0.01], but not for the CG (mean difference -4.9°, 95% CI -11.8 to 2.0; P=0.15). In the between-group comparison, the difference in elbow range of motion was significant (mean difference -10.5°, 95% CI -18.6 to -2.3; P=0.013), but the differences in grip strength (P=0.06) and neck pain (P=0.38) were not significant.
The SMI technique has an immediate positive effect on elbow extension in the ULNT-1. No immediate effects on self-perceived cervical pain or grip strength were observed.
评估枕下肌抑制(SMI)技术对以下方面的即时效果:(a)颈部疼痛;(b)正中神经上肢神经动力学测试(ULNT - 1)期间的肘部伸展活动范围;(c)颈椎挥鞭伤患者的握力;并确定关键变量之间的关系。
随机、单盲、对照临床试验。
西班牙塞维利亚大学护理、物理治疗与足病学系。
招募了40名I级或II级颈椎挥鞭伤且对ULNT - 1呈阳性反应的受试者{平均年龄34岁[标准差(SD)3.6]},并将其分为两个研究组:干预组(IG)(n = 20)和对照组(CG)(n = 20)。
IG接受4分钟的SMI技术,CG接受假(安慰剂)干预。干预后立即收集测量数据。
主要结局是用角度计测量的ULNT - 1期间的肘部活动范围。次要结局是自我感知的颈部疼痛(视觉模拟量表)和用数字测力计测量的无痛握力。
CG的平均基线肘部活动范围为116.0°(SD 10.2),IG为130.1°(SD 7.8)。组内比较发现IG的肘部活动范围有显著差异[平均差异 - 15.4°,95%置信区间(CI) - 20.1至 - 10.6;P = 0.01],但CG无显著差异(平均差异 - 4.9°,95% CI - 11.8至2.0;P = 0.15)。组间比较中,肘部活动范围差异显著(平均差异 - 10.5°,95% CI - 18.6至 - 2.3;P = 0.013),但握力(P = 0.06)和颈部疼痛(P = 0.38)差异不显著。
SMI技术对ULNT - 1中的肘部伸展有即时积极效果。未观察到对自我感知的颈部疼痛或握力有即时影响。