Suppr超能文献

颈椎挥鞭伤患者采用枕下肌抑制技术后正中神经神经张力的短期变化:一项随机对照试验

Short-term changes in median nerve neural tension after a suboccipital muscle inhibition technique in subjects with cervical whiplash: a randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

Antolinos-Campillo P J, Oliva-Pascual-Vaca A, Rodríguez-Blanco C, Heredia-Rizo A M, Espí-López G V, Ricard F

机构信息

Madrid Osteopathic School, Madrid, Spain.

Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2014 Sep;100(3):249-55. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.09.005. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the immediate effect of a suboccipital muscle inhibition (SMI) technique on: (a) neck pain, (b) elbow extension range of motion during the upper limb neurodynamic test of the median nerve (ULNT-1), and (c) grip strength in subjects with cervical whiplash; and determine the relationships between key variables.

DESIGN

Randomised, single-blind, controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty subjects {mean age 34 years [standard deviation (SD) 3.6]} with Grade I or II cervical whiplash and a positive response to the ULNT-1 were recruited and distributed into two study groups: intervention group (IG) (n=20) and control group (CG) (n=20).

INTERVENTIONS

The IG underwent the SMI technique for 4minutes and the CG received a sham (placebo) intervention. Measures were collected immediately after the intervention.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was elbow range of motion during the ULNT-1, measured with a goniometer. The secondary outcomes were self-perceived neck pain (visual analogue scale) and free-pain grip strength, measured with a digital dynamometer.

RESULTS

The mean baseline elbow range of motion was 116.0° (SD 10.2) for the CG and 130.1° (SD 7.8) for the IG. The within-group comparison found a significant difference in elbow range of motion for the IG [mean difference -15.4°, 95% confidence interval (CI) -20.1 to -10.6; P=0.01], but not for the CG (mean difference -4.9°, 95% CI -11.8 to 2.0; P=0.15). In the between-group comparison, the difference in elbow range of motion was significant (mean difference -10.5°, 95% CI -18.6 to -2.3; P=0.013), but the differences in grip strength (P=0.06) and neck pain (P=0.38) were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The SMI technique has an immediate positive effect on elbow extension in the ULNT-1. No immediate effects on self-perceived cervical pain or grip strength were observed.

摘要

目的

评估枕下肌抑制(SMI)技术对以下方面的即时效果:(a)颈部疼痛;(b)正中神经上肢神经动力学测试(ULNT - 1)期间的肘部伸展活动范围;(c)颈椎挥鞭伤患者的握力;并确定关键变量之间的关系。

设计

随机、单盲、对照临床试验。

地点

西班牙塞维利亚大学护理、物理治疗与足病学系。

参与者

招募了40名I级或II级颈椎挥鞭伤且对ULNT - 1呈阳性反应的受试者{平均年龄34岁[标准差(SD)3.6]},并将其分为两个研究组:干预组(IG)(n = 20)和对照组(CG)(n = 20)。

干预措施

IG接受4分钟的SMI技术,CG接受假(安慰剂)干预。干预后立即收集测量数据。

主要结局指标

主要结局是用角度计测量的ULNT - 1期间的肘部活动范围。次要结局是自我感知的颈部疼痛(视觉模拟量表)和用数字测力计测量的无痛握力。

结果

CG的平均基线肘部活动范围为116.0°(SD 10.2),IG为130.1°(SD 7.8)。组内比较发现IG的肘部活动范围有显著差异[平均差异 - 15.4°,95%置信区间(CI) - 20.1至 - 10.6;P = 0.01],但CG无显著差异(平均差异 - 4.9°,95% CI - 11.8至2.0;P = 0.15)。组间比较中,肘部活动范围差异显著(平均差异 - 10.5°,95% CI - 18.6至 - 2.3;P = 0.013),但握力(P = 0.06)和颈部疼痛(P = 0.38)差异不显著。

结论

SMI技术对ULNT - 1中的肘部伸展有即时积极效果。未观察到对自我感知的颈部疼痛或握力有即时影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验