Suppr超能文献

不同分辨率和单位的锥形束 CT 图像中髁突缺损的检测准确性。

Detection accuracy of condylar defects in cone beam CT images scanned with different resolutions and units.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(3):20130414. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130414. Epub 2014 Jan 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of spatial resolution and cone beam CT (CBCT) unit on CBCT images for the detection accuracy of condylar defects.

METHODS

42 temporomandibular joints were scanned, respectively, with the CBCT units ProMax® 3D (Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland) and DCT PRO (Vatech, Co., Ltd., Yongin-Si, Republic of Korea) at normal and high resolutions. Seven dentists evaluated all the test images with respect to the presence or the absence of condylar defects. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to define the detection accuracy. Two-way analysis of variance was used to analyse the values under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the differences among imaging groups and observers. Intraobserver variation was analysed using the Wilcoxon test.

RESULTS

Macroscopic anatomy examination revealed that, of the 42 temporomandibular joint condylar surfaces, 18 were normal and 24 had defects on the surface of condyles. No significant differences were found between the images scanned with normal and high resolutions for both CBCT units ProMax 3D (p = 0.119) and DCT PRO (p = 0.740). Significant differences exist between image groups of DCT PRO and ProMax 3D (p < 0.05). Neither the inter- nor the intraobserver variability were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The spatial resolution per se did not have an impact on the detection accuracy of condylar defects. The detection accuracy of condylar defects highly depends on the CBCT unit used for examination.

摘要

目的

评估空间分辨率和锥形束 CT(CBCT)对髁突缺损检测准确性的 CBCT 图像的影响。

方法

分别使用 ProMax® 3D(Planmeca Oy,赫尔辛基,芬兰)和 DCT PRO(Vatech,Co.,Ltd.,Yongin-Si,韩国)CBCT 设备以正常和高分辨率扫描 42 个颞下颌关节。7 名牙医评估了所有测试图像中髁突是否存在缺陷。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析来定义检测准确性。采用双向方差分析来分析不同成像组和观察者之间的受试者工作特征曲线下值。采用 Wilcoxon 检验分析观察者内变异性。

结果

宏观解剖学检查显示,在 42 个颞下颌关节髁突表面中,18 个正常,24 个表面有缺陷。ProMax 3D(p=0.119)和 DCT PRO(p=0.740)两种 CBCT 设备的正常和高分辨率扫描图像之间没有发现差异。DCT PRO 和 ProMax 3D 的图像组之间存在显著差异(p<0.05)。观察者内和观察者间的变异性均不显著。

结论

空间分辨率本身不会影响髁突缺损的检测准确性。髁突缺陷的检测准确性高度依赖于用于检查的 CBCT 设备。

相似文献

1
Detection accuracy of condylar defects in cone beam CT images scanned with different resolutions and units.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(3):20130414. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130414. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
2
Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013;42(5):20120241. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20120241. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
3
Evaluation of cone-beam computed tomography in the diagnosis of simulated small osseous defects in the mandibular condyle.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Feb;145(2):143-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.10.014.
5
Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.
Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Aug;16(4):1015-21. doi: 10.1007/s00784-011-0599-7. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
6
Validation of a novel semi-automated method for three-dimensional surface rendering of condyles using cone beam computed tomography data.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Aug;42(8):1023-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.016. Epub 2013 Mar 23.
7
Regional 3D superimposition to assess temporomandibular joint condylar morphology.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(1):20130273. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130273. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
8
Association between mandibular condylar position and clinical dysfunction index.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 May;43(4):432-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
10
[Three-dimensional quantitative evaluation of condylar bone remodeling of temporomandibular joint based on cone-beam CT imaging].
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020 Sep 9;55(9):617-623. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20200507-00249.

引用本文的文献

3
Osseous changes in the temporomandibular joint in rheumatoid arthritis: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Imaging Sci Dent. 2018 Mar;48(1):1-9. doi: 10.5624/isd.2018.48.1.1. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
4
Prediction of detectability of the mandibular canal by quantitative image quality evaluation using cone beam CT.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 May;47(4):20170369. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170369. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Temporomandibular Joint Anatomy Assessed by CBCT Images.
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2916953. doi: 10.1155/2017/2916953. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
9
Temporomandibular joint diagnostics using CBCT.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140235. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140235.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of scan setting selections on root canal visibility with cone beam CT.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(8):645-8. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/27670911.
2
Contrast-to-noise ratio with different large volumes in a cone-beam computerized tomography machine: an in vitro study.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Nov;114(5):658-65. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2012.08.436.
3
Measurement accuracy of temporomandibular joint space in Promax 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography images.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012 Jul;114(1):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2011.11.020. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
7
Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners.
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Feb;81(2):267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.11.028. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
8
Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Dec;110(6):770-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.06.013. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
10
A comparative evaluation of Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) and Multi-Slice CT (MSCT) Part I. On subjective image quality.
Eur J Radiol. 2010 Aug;75(2):265-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.042. Epub 2009 May 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验