Camarata Stephen
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine , TN , USA.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Feb;16(1):1-10. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2013.858773.
Over the past decade, there has been increased interest in identifying autism and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in toddlers. Although there is a strong rationale for identifying ASD early and delivering effective intervention, a recent report in the journal Pediatrics raises important questions about the scientific evidence currently available supporting early intervention. In addition, the British National Health Service (NHS) has not adopted universal screening for autism, even though the American (US) Academy of Pediatrics endorsed a recommendation that all toddlers be screened for ASD by the age of 24 months (in 2007). The goal of this initiative is to identify and, where indicated, provide early intervention for autism and ASD. Although it is inarguable that this is a worthwhile and laudable goal, the systematic study of this goal is confounded by the inherent difficulty in reliably identifying autism in 24-month-old toddlers. It is challenging to demonstrate intervention effects in the absence of randomly assigned control groups in an increasingly heterogeneous ASD population. The purpose of this paper is to examine the current literature on early identification and early intervention in autism and ASD and to provide a framework for examining these issues.
在过去十年中,人们对识别幼儿自闭症及自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的兴趣与日俱增。尽管早期识别ASD并提供有效干预有充分的理由,但《儿科学》杂志最近的一份报告对目前支持早期干预的科学证据提出了重要质疑。此外,英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)并未采用针对自闭症的普遍筛查,尽管美国儿科学会在2007年认可了一项建议,即所有幼儿应在24个月大时接受ASD筛查。该倡议的目标是识别自闭症和ASD,并在必要时提供早期干预。尽管这是一个值得追求且值得称赞的目标,但由于在24个月大的幼儿中可靠识别自闭症存在固有困难,对这一目标的系统研究受到了干扰。在日益多样化的ASD人群中,若没有随机分配的对照组,要证明干预效果具有挑战性。本文的目的是审视当前关于自闭症和ASD早期识别与早期干预的文献,并提供一个审视这些问题的框架。