ARC Insect Physiology Group Department of Pure and Applied Biology, Imperial College, SW7 2AZ, London, UK.
J Chem Ecol. 1982 Sep;8(9):1207-15. doi: 10.1007/BF00990753.
This communication reappraises the behavioral evidence concerning insect flight toward a point source of wind-borne odor in the light of meteorological information not yet considered in this context. The horizontal tracks of puffs of smoke from a generator in the open air were videorecorded and found to continue along nearly straight lines from the source for at least 25 m, while the shifting wind direction caused the plume formed by the succession of puffs to "snake" to and fro. It is inferred from this and much previous work that within such a distance the wind will be aligned on the source of any wind-borne odor wherever the odor can be detected. This being so, a strategy of finding the odor source by flying roughly upwind on meeting the odor, but holding station against the wind with or without casting across it on losing the odor (odor-modulated anemotaxis), seems likely to be highly adaptive, whereas a strategy of flying along the plume ("odor-trail following") seems unlikely since it would often take the flier in "wrong" directions and would be more disrupted by turbulence.
本通信根据气象信息重新评估了昆虫飞向随风飘散的气味源的行为证据,而这些信息在这一背景下尚未被考虑。在露天环境中,烟雾发生器所产生的烟羽水平轨迹被录像记录下来,并发现其至少沿直线从源延伸 25 米,而风向的变化导致由连续烟羽形成的羽流“蜿蜒”来回移动。从这一点以及之前的大量工作中可以推断,在这样的距离内,无论气味是否能被检测到,风都会与任何随风飘散的气味源对齐。如果是这样,那么在遇到气味时大致逆风飞行以找到气味源的策略,而不是在失去气味时迎风保持静止(气味调制的风定向),或者逆风穿越(逆风交叉)(odor-modulated anemotaxis),似乎更具适应性,而沿着羽流飞行(“气味追踪”)的策略似乎不太可能,因为它经常会将飞行者带到“错误”的方向,并会受到更多湍流的干扰。