Adebajo Sylvia, Obianwu Otibho, Eluwa George, Vu Lung, Oginni Ayo, Tun Waimar, Sheehy Meredith, Ahonsi Babatunde, Bashorun Adebobola, Idogho Omokhudu, Karlyn Andrew
Population Council, Abuja, Nigeria.
Population Services International (PSI), Washington, DC, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 8;9(1):e81981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081981. eCollection 2014.
Face-to-face (FTF) interviews are the most frequently used means of obtaining information on sexual and drug injecting behaviours from men who have sex with men (MSM) and men who inject drugs (MWID). However, accurate information on these behaviours may be difficult to elicit because of sociocultural hostility towards these populations and the criminalization associated with these behaviours. Audio computer assisted self-interview (ACASI) is an interviewing technique that may mitigate social desirability bias in this context.
This study evaluated differences in the reporting of HIV-related risky behaviours by MSM and MWID using ACASI and FTF interviews. Between August and September 2010, 712 MSM and 328 MWID in Nigeria were randomized to either ACASI or FTF interview for completion of a behavioural survey that included questions on sensitive sexual and injecting risk behaviours. Data were analyzed separately for MSM and MWID. Logistic regression was run for each behaviour as a dependent variable to determine differences in reporting methods.
MSM interviewed via ACASI reported significantly higher risky behaviours with both women (multiple female sexual partners 51% vs. 43%, p = 0.04; had unprotected anal sex with women 72% vs. 57%, p = 0.05) and men (multiple male sex partners 70% vs. 54%, p≤0.001) than through FTF. Additionally, they were more likely to self-identify as homosexual (AOR: 3.3, 95%CI:2.4-4.6) and report drug use in the past 12 months (AOR:40.0, 95%CI: 9.6-166.0). MWID interviewed with ACASI were more likely to report needle sharing (AOR:3.3, 95%CI:1.2-8.9) and re-use (AOR:2.2, 95%CI:1.2-3.9) in the past month and prior HIV testing (AOR:1.6, 95%CI 1.02-2.5).
The feasibility of using ACASI in studies and clinics targeting key populations in Nigeria must be explored to increase the likelihood of obtaining more accurate data on high risk behaviours to inform improved risk reduction strategies that reduce HIV transmission.
面对面访谈是从男男性行为者(MSM)和注射毒品的男性(MWID)获取有关性行为和注射行为信息最常用的方式。然而,由于社会文化对这些人群的敌意以及与这些行为相关的刑事定罪,可能难以获取有关这些行为的准确信息。音频计算机辅助自我访谈(ACASI)是一种在这种情况下可能减轻社会期望偏差的访谈技术。
本研究评估了使用ACASI和面对面访谈时,男男性行为者和注射毒品的男性在报告与艾滋病毒相关的危险行为方面的差异。2010年8月至9月期间,尼日利亚的712名男男性行为者和328名注射毒品的男性被随机分配接受ACASI或面对面访谈,以完成一项行为调查,其中包括有关敏感性行为和注射风险行为的问题。对男男性行为者和注射毒品的男性的数据分别进行了分析。以每种行为作为因变量进行逻辑回归,以确定报告方式的差异。
通过ACASI接受访谈的男男性行为者报告与女性(多个女性性伴侣51%对43%,p = 0.04;与女性进行无保护肛交72%对57%,p = 0.05)和男性(多个男性性伴侣70%对54%,p≤0.001)发生的危险行为明显高于面对面访谈。此外,他们更有可能自我认同为同性恋(优势比:3.3,95%置信区间:2.4 - 4.6)并报告在过去12个月内使用过毒品(优势比:40.0,95%置信区间:9.6 - 166.0)。接受ACASI访谈的注射毒品的男性在过去一个月更有可能报告共用针头(优势比:3.3,95%置信区间:1.2 - 8.9)和重复使用(优势比:2.2,95%置信区间:1.2 - 3.9)以及之前的艾滋病毒检测(优势比:1.6,95%置信区间1.02 - 2.5)。
必须探索在针对尼日利亚关键人群的研究和诊所中使用ACASI的可行性,以增加获取有关高风险行为更准确数据的可能性,从而为改进减少艾滋病毒传播的风险降低策略提供信息。